BuzzerBeater Forums

Australia - IV.7 > NRL Grand Final 2011

NRL Grand Final 2011

Set priority
Show messages by
From: JW

This Post:
00
197217.5 in reply to 197217.2
Date: 9/26/2011 8:28:27 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
7070
I believe his first name was actually Winston, and I don't see what he has to do with this anyway.
hahahah the Clive Churchill medal is the Norm Smith equivalant. The award for best on ground was named after a Rugby League player called Clive Churchill and not Winston Churchill.
jw

From: Trikster

To: JW
This Post:
00
197217.6 in reply to 197217.4
Date: 9/26/2011 8:35:57 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
485485
yeah and the warriors beat my storm and I still want them to win ..... shows how much I hate Manly ;)

From: RabidCamel

To: JW
This Post:
00
197217.7 in reply to 197217.5
Date: 9/26/2011 10:58:59 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
222222
I know :)

From: JW

This Post:
00
197217.8 in reply to 197217.7
Date: 9/26/2011 11:24:00 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
7070
and all this time i thought you were some lost Southern Australian who only knows about the Crows and 36ers!! all that effort posting a detailed post for nothing!! hahaha
jw

From: RabidCamel

To: JW
This Post:
00
197217.9 in reply to 197217.8
Date: 9/27/2011 12:33:54 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
222222
Ha - I used to go to the Rams games at Adelaide Oval! Ahh, Rams... we miss you.

From: zyler

To: JW
This Post:
00
197217.10 in reply to 197217.9
Date: 9/27/2011 12:51:27 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
217217
Manly to win , and quite easily at that.

cherry evans for the church

From: zyler

This Post:
00
197217.11 in reply to 197217.10
Date: 10/2/2011 4:54:09 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
217217
hell yer manly

From: Trikster

This Post:
00
197217.12 in reply to 197217.11
Date: 10/2/2011 6:17:39 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
485485
I can't believe when faced with the choice of favoring Manly or anyone else the refs actual chose Manly!! Selective memory on the obstruction rule a prime example

From: zyler

This Post:
00
197217.13 in reply to 197217.12
Date: 10/2/2011 6:47:33 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
217217
my father has been a ref his whole life , it wasnt an obstruction , if your talking about the tackle inu did from behind cherry evans , balin did not run behind cherry , nor did cherry change his direction to impede a player , when a player makes a play to a tackle from behind like inu did these are the only parts of the obstruction rule that comes into play.

also if you rewatch it inu tackles cherry on purpose to stop balin passing him the ball and should have been a penalty to manly.


the refs missed alot of stuff mainly in favour of the warriors , for example the warriors first try should not have been awarded due to one of the players pushing cherry evans over as he played the ball preventing him from tackling the dummy half who ran five metres before offloading to johnson.

an insanely bs call was the no try call against foran who clearly scored yet bias video ref hits the red button , after watching the replay six times it was clear to anyone who knows the rules that it was a try.

the refs missed some calls against manly aswell for example watmough getting up n playing the ball sideways , jamie lyons very clear strip , which was argued by the captain of the warriors to no avail.
n im sure they missed a few other things of which i cant clearly recall right now.

with all that said though i can assure you there was only one obstruction in the whole game that went uncalled and it wasnt by manly :)

From: Trikster

This Post:
00
197217.14 in reply to 197217.13
Date: 10/2/2011 6:59:13 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
485485
Well spoken by a typical Manly supporter ;)

From: zyler

This Post:
00
197217.15 in reply to 197217.14
Date: 10/2/2011 7:05:53 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
217217
usual hate blinded non manly supporter ;)

( may be the first time a manly supporter has been accused of being well spoken lol )

oh n my father was going for warriors by the way , as his an avid broncs supporter n was quite pissed that they lost.

Advertisement