BuzzerBeater Forums

Suggestions > Salaries

Salaries

Set priority
Show messages by
From: auf15
This Post:
00
10532.1
Date: 12/22/2007 1:42:47 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
Maybe it's only my opinion, but i think it's so unreal that most players have a higher fee than his value at the market. In real life players received always lower salary than the price they are sold for other teams and in buzzerbeater it only happens if we try to get superstars, because all the players with a salary lower than $3000 are sold for less than that price.

So buying this kind of players destroy our economy beause we don´t receive any awards for selling them, so we are losing money amost every time we buy a player.

From: packer_22

This Post:
00
10532.3 in reply to 10532.1
Date: 12/24/2007 2:13:44 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
because the game is so young, there is massive inflation and all the biggest teams have huge amounts of money with nothing to spend it on. Thus, they spend it on superstars. I know, not fair, just wait it out.

Daniel

P.S. I saw a guy in the NBBA ( I'm not saying who (Demon Hoosier)) offer a million dollars for a double prominent.

Edited by packer_22 (12/24/2007 2:14:08 AM CET)

Last edited by packer_22 at 12/24/2007 2:14:08 AM

From: packer_22

This Post:
00
10532.5 in reply to 10532.4
Date: 12/24/2007 5:35:49 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
I have only 200,000, so to me it is a lot! I wonder how much money ARE you guys in the NBBA hoarding up there? :)

This Post:
00
10532.6 in reply to 10532.2
Date: 12/24/2007 7:26:24 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
No, it's logical pay for buying someone jaja what i was trying to say it's that the money you get when you sold someone is too much lower than the money you have pay him for 1 week salary so it's not interesting buying players because you won't get money back in the future.

I'm not sure because i haven't sold any players i have train but probably also in that cases managers are losing money.