BuzzerBeater Forums

BB USA > Role Models

Role Models

Set priority
Show messages by
From: FatCurry

To: Coco
This Post:
00
116951.2 in reply to 116951.1
Date: 10/28/2009 3:22:26 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
112112
Great post Coco, perhaps the teams you mentioned above could pass down some advice on single position training. I know I would appreciate any new insight that I can gain!


This Post:
00
116951.3 in reply to 116951.2
Date: 10/29/2009 12:07:32 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
137137
I'm always curious, with single position training, you just try to max out two players and give whatever balance to the 3rd?


This Post:
00
116951.4 in reply to 116951.3
Date: 10/29/2009 1:24:08 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
103103
In simplest form, you 48 a trainee each game, and have a different trainee backing up at the "2nd position" for the skill you're training, so that if the 48 minute playing goes wrong, you have a 2-position training option open (depending on which trainee got messed up).

In order to "guarantee" 48 minutes, you have to have a player that's not a thug, dress the player as Starter-Backup-Reserve for the training position, and have everyone else on the roster as either a Starter or a Backup+Reserve for one of the other positions. This limits you to no more than 9 players dressed. If you have players dressed but not on the DC, or you have a Backup AND a Reserve (neither of whom start anywhere) dressed for a position, the blowout rule will cause your trainee to get pulled.

This Post:
00
116951.5 in reply to 116951.3
Date: 10/29/2009 8:08:29 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
112112
Steve if your signed up to the NT offsite forum Coco Gave a amazing explanation of it there.

This Post:
00
116951.6 in reply to 116951.3
Date: 10/30/2009 3:00:16 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
4242
I would also like to add on to Azariah's post. His response is pretty much dead on, but please note that doing what Azariah says is the absolute uptimum for training. There are of course situations in which you will not be able to afford only dressing 9 guys and having one player play the entire game. In my opinion, it is these situations that truly separate the good managers from the not-so-good managers. This is the beauty of BB - you have to somehow try to balance winning league games, staying in the cup, training minutes, and game shape. Many times you have to prioritize...

This Post:
00
116951.7 in reply to 116951.6
Date: 11/1/2009 12:44:44 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
137137
In my opinion, it is these situations that truly separate the good managers from the not-so-good managers. This is the beauty of BB - you have to somehow try to balance winning league games, staying in the cup, training minutes, and game shape. Many times you have to prioritize...


Really, I seem to do that okay with that...I just choke in the playoffs.


This Post:
00
116951.8 in reply to 116951.3
Date: 11/4/2009 12:20:55 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
1515
I'm always curious, with single position training, you just try to max out two players and give whatever balance to the 3rd?
That's what I'm doing right now. I have two 18yo USA bigs that I'm training, and my third is an 18yo I could get cheap because of lower potential. They swap starting positions in my league games, with whoever doesn't get the full training minutes generally playing backup in the scrimmage. I have some other reasonably young players sitting around for when I need to train something that isn't available at one position training (i.e. rebounding). Of course, I could just train that during the short weeks, and that would work too.

The thing I'm thinking about right now is how appropriate single position training is for me, as someone who is just starting out. It doesn't seem very conducive for team building, since I'm just getting help at one (or two when they're finished training) position. Since I'm training bigs, I will have a weak guard lineup, and since I'm only really training two guys, I won't have much of anyone to sell and buy some help. What I'm thinking right now is that I'll continue training my guys for 2-3 more seasons, and then buy some 18yo guards and start training them. Don't really know what I'll do for an SF though, I might need to buy a short 18yo with good inside skills and give him the leftover guard training.

What I'm wondering is if I would be better off to do two position training inside, accumulate some extra players inside, and basically trade them for guards of comparable quality. (i.e. what the game manual recommends) The reason I'm not doing that now is that it seems like I'm wasting potential. The two guys I'm training are allstar(10592590) and perennial allstar(11435847), and I think I would have to train them until they were 25 to reach those caps if I was doing two position training. I'd rather train them for 3 years, and then know they would be my starters for the next 10 years. I should have accumulated enough money just from weekly income to buy some high potential guards by that time.

This Post:
00
116951.10 in reply to 116951.9
Date: 11/4/2009 1:32:34 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
137137
I guess my biggest issue with single position training is whether it will generate the same profits as two position training. I'm not really sure...has anyone looked into that?