but a better thing is to NOT train them on rebounds,if they are not able to play in the Sf position
but a better thing is to NOT train them on rebounds,if they are not able to play in the Sf positionYou mean because of the salary impact, right?
For sure...salary and potential cap impact
But for sure, especially on high level players, there is a salary impact. The only question is if the impact is worth it. I personally think it can be. As for the potential cap, maybe there is an impact. We do not know yet. Although if you have the proof on this, it will save me some time. ;-)
The actual coach of the South African U21,that I help being a scout for him,trained the starter PG in the Italian U21 team some seasons ago.His Pg had only 7 in potential,but was able to have enough primary skills to be a so important part of the team due to the lack in inside skills that allow him to avoid the cap potential,while other players of his age with the same potential weren't able to grow during the season.
And as you know, salary and potential cap are related,
Personally I think that salary impact of rebound doesn't worth it
But what if - the effect of winning the rebounding battle gives you more than what the guard's stats say? What if it also has a trickle down effect on all your other players... In fact, this is my personal speculation on how they implemented "boxing out". I don't know, maybe even with that, it is still not enough to justify the salary.
P.S. It exists sub-level in potential,but however a 7 potential with good sub levels,with high rebound,doesn't have room for enough primary skills to be in the italian U21