BuzzerBeater Forums

Bugs, bugs, bugs > Different NT Line-up than submitted

Different NT Line-up than submitted

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
161567.1
Date: 10/18/2010 1:48:57 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
204204
Yesterday evening I have submitted the line-up for the dutch NT, the line up was:

Line Up

PG van der Pennen
WPG Duister
RPG: Boissevain

SG Benjamin
WSG Hieltjes
RSG: de Bevere

SF Bernlef
WSF Boissevain
RSF: de Bevere

PF van der Linde
WPF Heijnen
RPF: Kooyker

C van Voorthuizen
WC Bekkering
RC: Kooyker

Offensive tactic: Look Inside
Defensive tactic: Man 2 Man

The coach decides
Sit them
Take It Easy

I've checked this line up and decided that it should be my standard line-up and checked that box after checking.

However now playing (starters I know for sure, reserves not (yet) ):
PG Van der Pennen
WPG Duister

SG Hieltjes
WSG Bernlef

SF Benjamin
WSF Boissevain

PF van der Linde
PF Heijnen

C van Voorthuizen
WC Bekkering

I demand a investigation, and first of all I hope this won't cost my country dearly.. cause this can cost us TeamSpirit, if this has changed. I think we'll win anyway

Last edited by Arsjitekt at 10/18/2010 1:49:25 PM

This Post:
00
161567.2 in reply to 161567.1
Date: 10/27/2010 10:43:05 AM
TrenseRI
III.2
Overall Posts Rated:
36003600
Second Team:
ChiLeaders
This Post:
00
161567.3 in reply to 161567.2
Date: 10/27/2010 9:13:59 PM
TrenseRI
III.2
Overall Posts Rated:
36003600
Second Team:
ChiLeaders
I guess this belongs in the "Wrong formation/enthusiasm used" thread. So far, the only way to eliminate the problem is not to use "the coach decides" or one of the other substitution tactics but rather always "strictly follow depth chart", which has proven to be unaffected by the bug.

This Post:
00
161567.4 in reply to 161567.3
Date: 10/30/2010 6:31:28 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
343343
On that game (28999636) Paphos claims that he put Chatzakis as a starter, but he didnt play at all.

This Post:
00
161567.5 in reply to 161567.3
Date: 11/1/2010 7:05:25 PM
bilaris
III.16
Overall Posts Rated:
117117
In this Matchhttp://www.buzzerbeater.com/match/26329402/boxscore.aspx

how is it possible the best player of my team (with a wage of over 60.000)[player=http://www.buzzerbeater.com/player/6231977/overview.aspx] that I placed him as a sub for SG and SF and as a reserve for PG to play in a match that went to overtime only 12 mins whereas the SG and SF played 50 and 44 mins ?

What do we want the subs and the reserves when a player is a sub in 2 positions having twice their wage and better skills (you can see that by his percentages and his rating) doesn't take satisfactory playing time.

in my lineup I had chosen "let coach decide" but its not an excuse to this whole thing no matter how "dumb" the coach is


This Post:
11
161567.6 in reply to 161567.5
Date: 11/2/2010 10:13:22 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
699699
If you have chosen "Let coach decide" then your coach is supposed to start the best players. If he didn't play your 60k SG maybe he is not a better player than your other guards. Since you are selling him and I can have a look at his skills, I find he is a very one-dimensional player and if your guards are more rounded, they are better than him despite the salary comparison.

By the way, you are cheeky since you are day-trading with this best player of yours that he is not really your player or well only for a few days. I hope for you that you'll make 1M but I really doubt it ;)

In addition, it is forbidden to link to a player on the TL.
Sorry to be a nuisance today :)

Message deleted