BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > Cross Training

Cross Training (thread closed)

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
181778.1
Date: 4/19/2011 6:20:51 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
3333
Thoughts?

As a small forward coach I personally believe this could be very beneficial, especially long term.
I also think it will add a bit more excitement to the training process. Imagine getting an unexpected pop in an important secondary.

This Post:
00
181778.2 in reply to 181778.1
Date: 4/19/2011 6:29:36 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
154154
I read it as the quickness of the training will be influenced even by unrelated skills (i.e. those who you can't get a secondary pop) and no extra pops in unrelated skills have been brought in. Otherwise some unwelcomed pops in say shotblocking could screw some players salarywise or even potentialwise bigtime.

This Post:
11
181778.3 in reply to 181778.2
Date: 4/19/2011 6:36:14 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
3333
Oh yeah, now I read it again that does make more sense. I'm guessing it's been done so that it's harder to create mono skilled players and easier to create more rounded players then.

This Post:
00
181778.4 in reply to 181778.3
Date: 4/19/2011 8:02:58 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
457457
I read it the same way as you did originally, and think that what it means is that more skills will receive an increase for each training area. So inside d might increase while training passing. We will just have to wait and see.

Once I scored a basket that still makes me laugh.
From: Stajan
This Post:
22
181778.6 in reply to 181778.5
Date: 4/20/2011 4:24:38 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
146146
Probably in the minority, but I don't like it. Having the option to use this or the old method would be nice - or having the option to pick your own secondaries (tertiaries?) would be fine.

Unlike most, I don't love all secondaries. I don't love REB on guards, for example. It's expensive and I feel the money could be better spent elsewhere. Maybe it can't, but it's personal opinion.

This Post:
00
181778.7 in reply to 181778.6
Date: 4/20/2011 4:45:31 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
12001200
Unlike most, I don't love all secondaries. I don't love REB on guards, for example. It's expensive and I feel the money could be better spent elsewhere. Maybe it can't, but it's personal opinion.

I strongly agree with you

From: Hadron
This Post:
11
181778.8 in reply to 181778.7
Date: 4/20/2011 8:48:13 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
3333
This starts next season or this season?

I just hope it means that JS JR training will result in FT pops.

From: Joker

This Post:
00
181778.9 in reply to 181778.8
Date: 4/20/2011 8:53:47 AM
TOP TEN THUNDERS
II.3
Overall Posts Rated:
186186
...

I just hope it means that JS JR training will result in FT pops.

and maybe 1on1 training will result in OD pops what is quite obvious in real basketball :)

From: Hadron

This Post:
00
181778.10 in reply to 181778.9
Date: 4/20/2011 9:03:46 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
3333
1 on 1 should pop everything then. And maybe it will. Lets see. But the strange case of players with high JS JR having atrocious FT that really puts me off.


This Post:
11
181778.11 in reply to 181778.10
Date: 4/20/2011 1:36:26 PM
BC Hostivař
II.2
Overall Posts Rated:
11551155
Second Team:
Jirkov
Some BBs explanation would be great as I think just docend24 understands the news as I did.
Example:
Now pressure training (OD) is quicker if player has high driving/handling.
I expect after the news is implemented also high ID, IS, rebounding etc. will help to train pressure (OD) more quickly.
I don't expect additional secondary pops in skills which are not popping for particular training now.