BuzzerBeater Forums

Suggestions > More Money

More Money

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
185598.1
Date: 5/22/2011 10:07:54 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
55
Why not get % of money in the later sale of a player who was in our team? And another one who started his career on our team.

This Post:
00
185598.2 in reply to 185598.1
Date: 5/22/2011 10:34:03 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
135135
Why would we get that money?

This Post:
00
185598.3 in reply to 185598.2
Date: 5/22/2011 11:54:08 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
55
Because we train this players and someone else will use them and when they sell this players the sell part of our labor

This Post:
00
185598.4 in reply to 185598.3
Date: 5/22/2011 12:22:30 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
135135
But you've already got your money when you sold him at first

From: Monkeybiz

This Post:
00
185598.6 in reply to 185598.5
Date: 5/22/2011 7:16:03 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
237237
Yeah I know how it works in soccer where the original team that trained the player can demand a certain % of the future transfer fee.

However this can get quite complicated not to mention the additional server load to keep track of all these things. And also if this transfer % is limited to the original team that drafted him.

I think it is best to keep it simple like it is. With the market, all training should be built into the price of the player

This Post:
00
185598.7 in reply to 185598.6
Date: 5/22/2011 7:38:50 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
13691369
Actually, most teams who sell their players early on sell their VALUE and the PROSPECT of a player more than they really sell any real training efforts put into a player. Paying a drafting team for future transfers after some other team did the training would be pretty wrong.

Zwei Dinge sind unendlich, die Dummheit und das All...
This Post:
00
185598.8 in reply to 185598.7
Date: 5/22/2011 7:41:29 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
237237
Good point!

Like I said, the value of it is already built into the market price of the player. So there is no need to have a further transfer % fee

From: yodabig

This Post:
00
185598.10 in reply to 185598.9
Date: 5/23/2011 6:08:55 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
14651465
Bad idea. It would just encourage teams to have a massive turnover of players that they could hope to recoup a later profit on turning this into more of a stockmarket game and less of a basketball game. Anything that encourages less trading would be more welcome.