BuzzerBeater Forums

Help - English > Which point guard would be better?

Which point guard would be better?

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
207716.1
Date: 1/30/2012 4:38:54 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
152152
I'm deciding a training schedule for my PG of the future, which would be better:
1) Jump Shot: prolific Jump Range: respectable
Outside Def.: stupendous Handling: sensational
Driving: prolific Passing: marvelous
Inside Shot: awful Inside Def.: respectable
Rebounding: awful Shot Blocking: awful

OR
2)Jump Shot: prominent Jump Range:prominent
Outside Def.:marvelous Handling: sensational
Driving: prolific Passing: marvelous
Inside Shot: awful Inside Def.: respectable
Rebounding: awful Shot Blocking: awful

Which one do you think would be the more effective point guard?

Check the Suggestions they are important
This Post:
00
207716.2 in reply to 207716.1
Date: 1/30/2012 4:58:07 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
431431
I like the first one better. Because I like defense.

This Post:
00
207716.3 in reply to 207716.1
Date: 1/30/2012 5:36:08 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
968968
First one because I think JR is over rated. Maybe one pop or two from OD to JS, but thats about it.

From: Saltori

This Post:
00
207716.4 in reply to 207716.3
Date: 1/30/2012 5:55:58 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
177177
First. Train 1x1 and JR.

This Post:
00
207716.5 in reply to 207716.1
Date: 1/30/2012 6:01:43 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
455455
Definitely the 1st one. Better defender, better shooter plus high JR is overrated as a skill and inflates the price without a ton of benefit.

This Post:
00
207716.6 in reply to 207716.1
Date: 1/31/2012 1:01:43 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
211211
unlike the others i would sa that the second one is better.
i mean u will face a high elastic effect while training the first one coz his JR is quite low.so his training will slow down by quite a bit.
thats y i think that the 2nd one will be a better PG.

This Post:
11
207716.7 in reply to 207716.6
Date: 1/31/2012 1:03:29 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
968968
thats y i think that the 2nd one will be a better PG.


No you described why the second player would be easier to train, but not the better point guard. The first option would be the better point guard.

This Post:
00
207716.8 in reply to 207716.7
Date: 1/31/2012 1:13:07 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
211211
yeah i know that i described that the second player is easier to train.probably coz the manager is still planning to train them.if he would be searching the player on the TL then i would have gone for the 2nd player.
i just gave equal value to skills and training time.
i know my opinion and reason is not much appreciable but thats what i thought.

This Post:
00
207716.9 in reply to 207716.8
Date: 1/31/2012 2:45:29 AM
Aussie Pride
II.3
Overall Posts Rated:
543543
From the wording of the post he is asking which will be the best final product.

This Post:
00
207716.10 in reply to 207716.9
Date: 1/31/2012 3:06:03 AM
Kings XI Punjab
ASL
Overall Posts Rated:
223223
Second Team:
Kings XI Punjab II
First is better then second at all.
But I didnt like any of them. As I believe in balanced players.

This Post:
00
207716.11 in reply to 207716.1
Date: 1/31/2012 4:57:22 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
i go for the second, the OD is good enough for the BB(i was there last season, with mx this OD and OD 13 bench guards ;)). AND jr Maybe not that important then JS, but respectable is the value i expect from my PF as a minimum, i would go down 1 and add it to JS or generally push him more in JS in exchange for a bit D and passing.