BuzzerBeater Forums

Suggestions > 2 Managers

2 Managers (thread closed)

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
11
227848.1
Date: 10/1/2012 8:12:55 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
11
Hi I wanted to suggest that BB can change its in game structure where it makes BB a more...hands on game such as ..say they did allow this to happen in season 23. I would imagine it being like 2 managers can choose to create a team which 1 manager can play as the GM which is what everyone is now and manage money and you know. But the other manager can be the coach and call plays and get to change defensive and offensive schemes and call time outs and do substitues and etc..

If a manager doesn't want to have 2 managers then they can just play as GM not Game Masters but General Managers. If 2 teams decide to join forces both of there original teams will be deleted and the players wil be sold and all of the money could be transfered to the GM of the 2 man team or they could just start off with a 5k arena and 500k in their account.


If a manager decides to join forces the managers will be put in a VI League with other managers who decided to join and they will be placed in that league for 1 season and the winner of the league advances and if the loser of the finals lost less than a total of 60 points combined each finals game and has a record of atleast 18-4 the they can promote but they will only receive 125k while the other team gets 200k.


If one of the manager is banned they will have 1 week to find another partner to help run the team or the head coach ill be no more and that player will return as GM of the team for the remainder of the season at which the end they may apply for a new partner.No 2 Managers who managed teams 6,000 or above may join each other.

Comment on this. Tell if you agree or not. Have a nice day :) No Spamming
I will imediatly reply to any questions or Comments

Last edited by Maybach Man at 10/1/2012 8:15:35 PM

This Post:
11
227848.2 in reply to 227848.1
Date: 10/1/2012 8:35:15 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
341341
Well. It sounds crazy enough to not work!

This Post:
00
227848.3 in reply to 227848.2
Date: 10/1/2012 8:50:46 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
172172
I have to agree, there's hardly anything in your suggestion that would work. First of all, you've only been playing this game for a week. Why not learn and discover more features before suggesting dramatic changes to the way everything works? Second, the games here are simulated before they're shown to us, so there is nobody calling the plays and the subs live. The point is having a game where the managers don't have to be online when their teams are playing. As such, the tactical part is "just" setting up the lineup and choosing the offensive/defensive schemes, subs pattern and attitude, hardly requiring an extra person just to do this...

If we want to have a discussion on how to make things more complex, and more interesting, both on the GM part and the tactics part, I'm all for it, but hardly in the terms you've suggested.

This Post:
00
227848.5 in reply to 227848.3
Date: 10/2/2012 6:50:25 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
11
Trust me ive been playing this game more than just a week so I think I know about how this works and all. But its kinda crazy how you just immediatly shoot down my idea and you compare this imaginary BB that im talkin about to the current BB so YOU need to be quiet and actually read the idea I made Ok?



Ps: Its ok Ive seen stuff like this happen since season 16 so... its normal to me now

Last edited by Maybach Man at 10/2/2012 6:52:27 AM