Well I figure now is as good a time as ever to discuss SB and JR as BB is thinking about adjustments. I have a couple suggestions.
1) This one is just for JR. Reduce the salary hit.
2) Increase the effect of JR and SB(if salary unaffected).
3) I think this suggestion is the more critical one. Make JR and SB able to be two positioned trained(like JS and REB). I am almost positive that if JR and SB were able to be two position trained they would be trained more and [people would notice the effects of it more. There are three weeks a season(unless you make the finals) where you need to two position trained if you are training 3 players at once. I fill these holes from my one position training with 1on1 and REB training. If SB or JR were able to inclde two position training(instead of one position) then I would actually train those two skills from time to time. The way I one position train with 3 players is as so:
My first game trainee A would get 48+ at PG/C and trainee C would get backup minutes at SG/PF. Then game 2 trainee B gets 48 at PG/c and trainee A gets backup minutes at SG/PF. During my third game trainee C gets 48 at PG/C and trainee B gets backup minutes at SG/PF. This way if the minutes aren't sufficient I can switch to JS/1on1/REB training and still maximize training. I also plan at least two seasons in advance so these JS/1on1/REB trainings are not planned and might throw off the balance of my players. If JR or SB were two position trainable then I would probably fill the two game weeks with those as opposed to other training since I plan for the other ones.
Also lots of people who dont want to focus on training, but want to train their 3 or 4 trainees just casually two position train and players end up JS/HA/DR/IS heavy. JR and SB could balance that.
I think its a good fix.