The situation heading into the final round of Pool E was that the Philippines and Australia were 1st and 2nd in the group respectively, each sitting on a 3-1 record with only 3 PD separating them. Australia were to play Nippon (0-4 in the 2nd round), whilst the Philippines had Malaysia (1-3), and 1st would pretty much be decided by whichever team won by more, unless something crazy happened and one of them suffered and upset loss. Which wasn't as unlikely as you'd think; with Nippon and Malaysia both out of the running and now playing for pride, one would assume that they would both use Crunch Time in what would be their final competitive game for the season. Nippon did just that, giving Australia quite a challenge, even if they ended up losing because their manager, with no offence intended, doesn't seem to know how to use the GDP feature right.
But Malaysia?
They apparently TIE'D their last competitive game of the season when they had absolutely nothing to gain from doing so; (27772)Worse still, when I tried to question them about this decision, their national coach gave me a response that essentially meant '**** OFF!', which doesn't help his/her case one bit. It makes me believe that there may have been some kind of agreement in place between the Philippines and Malaysia for this game. In hindsight, it doesn't seem to have benefited the Philippines, as they now have to face China of all teams, but I'd like to know what could've possibly been going through the Malaysian coaches head when he decided to TIE this game, if it wasn't some kind of agreement...
Last edited by Jay (OTT) at 3/24/2014 3:11:41 PM