BuzzerBeater Forums

Utopia - IV.27 > Season 27

Season 27

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
256905.1
Date: 4/1/2014 9:28:20 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
32293229
I've got one 19 year old with star potential and nobody else even that high until age 25. I forgot how much starting teams sucked!
Poll:  How bad is your starting roster
Bad.
Really bad.
Unbelievably bad.
Kind of like Shaq shooting free throws.
Pretty good. (and you will be hated for it).

This Post:
00
256905.2 in reply to 256905.1
Date: 4/1/2014 10:28:10 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
312312
I guess my best trainee is the 20 year old superstar, but he's starting with just 35 TSP. May go with the two 19 year olds, as though they have just starter potential, they at least start with some skill.

The kick in the nuts is the 24 year old hall of famer who has only 32 TSP. lol

This Post:
00
256905.3 in reply to 256905.2
Date: 4/10/2014 3:03:24 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
32293229
It's exciting to see how close the standings are already.

It's also amusing to see that we've already got three teams who are deciding to try to build their teams by buying players and then trying to sell them for quite a bit more than their purchase price. You'd have to think that the prices are descending rapidly as we get further away from the crazy start to the season, but I suppose as long as you can find one n00b stupid enough to overlook what you bought the guy for last week, it's all cash money.

From: Jelme

This Post:
00
256905.4 in reply to 256905.3
Date: 4/12/2014 2:03:26 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
5050
I have to admit, I like the different times for the games.

Makes things pretty fun and changes it up. I'll hate it the first time I forgot to set a lineup though.

This Post:
00
256905.5 in reply to 256905.4
Date: 4/19/2014 7:47:47 PM
Pelevialli
III.9
Overall Posts Rated:
2222
Second Team:
Pelevialli II
This game is really stupid
I can't loose playing against this C (33119156), (who play 48 minutes!!! grab 10 rebound!!!! and score 12 points!!!!!), and with these final valutations
(71828841).
I can't explain my loss, another loose game with valutation that I can't understand.
I want my money back!!!

This Post:
00
256905.6 in reply to 256905.5
Date: 4/19/2014 9:49:45 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
32293229
This game is really stupid
I can't loose playing against this C (33119156), (who play 48 minutes!!! grab 10 rebound!!!! and score 12 points!!!!!), and with these final valutations
(71828841).
I can't explain my loss, another loose game with valutation that I can't understand.
I want my money back!!!


You should ask for your money back on whatever you paid to get your center. A player with 11 career assists and 339 career turnovers is a complete waste of money, and the fact that he seems to foul a lot doesn't help.

This Post:
00
256905.7 in reply to 256905.6
Date: 4/19/2014 10:11:17 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
5050
I mis-set my lineup, so you are lucky in a way. Don't just look at the "ratings". Check the PP100 as well.3 of my positions outscore you. You C did have larger differential but his fouls and the # of shots he took made his effect on the game smaller. PF was close to a wash. Also consider that my low salary C is young and 7'5. He does have 3 pops since the start of the season and is playing above the salary.

This Post:
00
256905.8 in reply to 256905.6
Date: 4/20/2014 3:47:46 AM
Pelevialli
III.9
Overall Posts Rated:
2222
Second Team:
Pelevialli II
I know I know, my C is a bad player, I bought him only for defense and rebound: in this aspects he works well.
Yesterday i have decided to attack under because I see that my opponent has no valid C and PF: my mistake, because his C (wage 2.500) score 12 points and grab 10 rebounds and his PF (wage 3.200) score 16 points and grab 17 rebounds!!!!
Fortunately my opponent plays run and gun ...

This Post:
00
256905.9 in reply to 256905.8
Date: 4/20/2014 2:32:15 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
32293229
I know I know, my C is a bad player, I bought him only for defense and rebound: in this aspects he works well.
Yesterday i have decided to attack under because I see that my opponent has no valid C and PF: my mistake, because his C (wage 2.500) score 12 points and grab 10 rebounds and his PF (wage 3.200) score 16 points and grab 17 rebounds!!!!
Fortunately my opponent plays run and gun ...


Well, Sen only shot 3-11; almost half of his points came from the FT line. The 3 point shot was made as a buzzer beater against your PF Kinoingan, who doesn't have enough history for me to guess if he's got any OD, though I'd guess it's probably pretty low. The other two shots he made were assisted, so the defense of center doesn't matter since he was unguarded. He made less than 30 percent of his shots, and two of the three fouls he got free throws on were not shooting fouls,but bonus FTs because your team had already fouled too much.

This Post:
00
256905.10 in reply to 256905.9
Date: 4/20/2014 3:52:44 PM
Pelevialli
III.9
Overall Posts Rated:
2222
Second Team:
Pelevialli II
ok, you are right.
I've only said that, looking the final valutations and the wages of our two teams (although this means nothing), I'm waiting a winning game (remember that I have +6 at 3 minutes to the end) and, in my opinion, I would deserve to win.
But I have lost and, always in my opinion, this is caused by an extraordinary game of your two palyers, PF and C, who played beyond their abilities

This Post:
00
256905.11 in reply to 256905.10
Date: 4/20/2014 5:00:59 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
32293229
ok, you are right.
I've only said that, looking the final valutations and the wages of our two teams (although this means nothing), I'm waiting a winning game (remember that I have +6 at 3 minutes to the end) and, in my opinion, I would deserve to win.
But I have lost and, always in my opinion, this is caused by an extraordinary game of your two palyers, PF and C, who played beyond their abilities


They weren't my players, they were Jelme's. I just jumped in the discussion because it was interesting.