BuzzerBeater Forums

Suggestions > 3rd Place Game for League competition

3rd Place Game for League competition

Set priority
Show messages by
From: DDS
This Post:
00
263117.1
Date: 10/7/2014 11:03:49 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
22
The league finals is a best of 3, the Relegation Game is a minimum 2 games and these are 6th and 7th place teams, why not institute a 3rd place game for the losing semifinalists? even with a 10k prize money?

Message deleted
Message deleted
From: abu

This Post:
00
263117.8 in reply to 263117.7
Date: 10/8/2014 10:24:02 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
3535
the 3rd place game IMO distinguishes playoff teams, since reaching the semis means you won your first round of playoff games.

so to be beneficial for the 2 losing semifinalist , they get an additional training minutes ( as mentioned by Sir Perpete), reward money ( 30k below for 3rd, 20k for 4th), and they do not get charged for staff salaries., that plus a winner take all gate receipt would be incentive enough to go for the 3rd place win.

Last edited by abu at 10/8/2014 10:25:29 AM

This Post:
22
263117.9 in reply to 263117.8
Date: 10/8/2014 11:41:51 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
32293229
I think if we're talking about a game for the four teams (two in each conference) who lost in the first round of the playoffs, there's some merit. Basically, they're paying a full week's salaries and only gaining a half a week's worth of arena revenue, which does diminish the value of making the playoffs. Giving them a second game that week would help, though I would also suggest that the attendance should be lower for the 'consolation' game than it would for a regular playoff game to ensure that winning the first game is more valuable than not.

If we're talking about a game/series between the losers of the conference finals, that's not really worth doing. Teams would still have to pay player salaries, which could lead to a negative economic impact for teams that are on a roughly balanced budget since they're paying full salaries again, while teams that buy and sell for playoffs will just sell their high end players, have a low wage bill and get the extra revenue.

I think the suggestion is more in line with the first option, and I think ensuring that a team that makes the playoffs with a fairly balanced economy should not lose money by doing so is a good thing.