BuzzerBeater Forums

yes or no. give a reason why.?

my opinion is it hurts the game, it also imbalances the game. A lot are talking about fairness and this fall into their argument of that.? IMo

Your thought please should LI be removed for the sake of this fairness argument a lot like to make.. My opinion basketball is meant to be fair. At same time this tactic imbalance the game and is killing BB the market. Something has to give in that aspect.

NO!
That would be the most stupid thing to do. As soon as you remove LI, another tactic will take its place and everyone will complain about it. And than, should we remove the next one? I don't think so.
You have to find the cause of this problem and solve it. And that would be remodelling the salary formula and balancing the skills. Decrease the impact of OD, higher salary for IS guards and decrease the gap between the power of outside teams and inside teams. Most of the time it's a bad joke how strong shooters (JS 17+ / JR 15+) are stopped by average OD teams.

I agree 100%. the GDP is a huge help to help balance things out and I personally see no need to delete LI from the game.

NO.

The only thing wrong with LI in the game is all the whining in the forums. They don't need to eliminate LI, they need to find a way to figuratively stuff a sock in all the whining.

When was it ever an improvement to remove something that works well? What you're left with is a lesser game, not a better one.

Last edited by Mike Franks at 11/30/2014 10:58:10 PM

I don't think it stupid thing to do .Think about it.


A lot know what your say is true, . LI is easy a fix if they do this or that .. But the reality is none of what they have done today is working. I don't see them making the said fixes.Managers are using these new prevents to increase dominance of LI in their own team at a cheaper cost rate.

Look at the market almost 75-80% of the players are LI players. Im just guessing with that. I would say its greater than my guess. Removing LI would make managers create other players for the market. We would see more Princeton players.. motion players. paitent players, push the ball etc etc.

Low post would be what they could play, At the same time low post can be beaten much more easy than LI? They would have to go another route.

Im just saying, don't you think it hurts the games with a majority of the market player being Li tactical players.? if the fixes where so easy and said sure. then why aren't any of them working??

Please leave me a 2nd reply.

But the reality is none of what they have done today is working.

BB is a long term game. Everything needs time until it shows its effect.

Look at the market almost 75-80% of the players are LI players.

Yes and in season 10 around 90% of the players were RnG types. There were no IS guards or even bigs. The bigs at that time were ID/RB guys and you had 3-4 shooters with high JS.

Removing LI would make managers create other players for the market. We would see more Princeton players.. motion players. paitent players, push the ball etc etc.

Nooo... The managers will find the easiest way to win and again, only one tactic will dominate. If you remove LI, most of the teams will turn to Motion. LP depends to heavy on the PF and C and RnG has a huge disadvantage because of the power of OD. You won't see more builds for patient or the isos, you will se a lot of Motion players.

At the same time low post can be beaten much more easy than LI? They would have to go another route.

LI is hard to beat? Urban legend. LI has to follow the same restrictions of the GE like all the other tactics. If you know these restrictions you can trap your opponent and beat him. The better your LI, the more your team is unbalanced. And this means there are huge flaws in your team which can be used against you.

Yes I know the facts but the bid difference is Lp can be beaten much easier than LI.

I dont think it whining its real BB concern in my book.. because motion is not as powerful as it use to be as matter of fact neither is run &gun.

They took measure to reduce those , they work. Li on the other hand the measures they have taken do not really work, gdp be damned. I don't assume a lot of shot block is going to work , you'll get getting alive by rebounds and second chance point from LI. Reb in guards is crazy expensive also with sb even more. Some may say the reduction helped but for who really know the pops are not as fact as some make them sound.

I think Sb increases fouls. Li increase fouls from my seeing . Li is a advanced tactic, there for like you said and I have said you need advanced players with good exp. This comes at huge cost also time.

BB know this, but why haven't they done it. why haven't they even really tried to do these fixes ?? I'm all for removing it. It not good for the market or the game. Some are saying run/gun and motion players are on the market.?? where?? haha thats new one. Some build them. like there a guide to do such act. In the 100% correct fashion

this is not gloom and doom thread or hate on bb. oh lala thread, this is reality. Li is way to strong.