BuzzerBeater Forums

Help - English > passing for PG+SG

passing for PG+SG

Set priority
Show messages by
From: Otis
This Post:
00
292269.1
Date: 1/27/2018 1:32:54 AM
The Defenders
RBBA
Overall Posts Rated:
447447
Second Team:
The D-fenders
hey guys. saw many numbers thrown around but would like your take on this question.

if i choose to train passing for PG+SG , based on your experience, what would be the training speed as opposed to single position?


if you dont mind i would prefer personal experience over spit-balling.
Poll:  passing for PG+SG
Response Votes Result
50-60% 5
15.2% 15.2% 15.2%
15.2%
60-70% 23
69.7% 69.7% 69.7%
69.7%
70-80% 5
15.2% 15.2% 15.2%
15.2%
This poll ended on 2/3/2018.

From: capali

To: Otis
This Post:
22
292269.2 in reply to 292269.1
Date: 1/27/2018 1:50:42 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
13351335
I would say it is around %65-70. The numbers that I have was from training source project (bb-usa).

For short and 18 years old players:

PG Passing : 0,66
PG/SG Passing: 0,48

From: Zolinho

This Post:
11
292269.4 in reply to 292269.3
Date: 1/27/2018 2:51:15 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
1111
I second this. My 20 yr old 6'10 PF gained 3 PA in 4 trainings.

From: MichTodd

To: Otis
This Post:
00
292269.5 in reply to 292269.1
Date: 1/28/2018 8:57:12 PM
Hemet Hooligans
III.16
Overall Posts Rated:
4646
So if i train one player PG, 3 guys at 100%
Or if i train two player PG+SG, 6 guys at 70%
If this is the case...wouldn't 2 player training be more efficient?

From: lvess

This Post:
11
292269.6 in reply to 292269.5
Date: 1/28/2018 9:18:33 PM
Delaware 87ers
II.3
Overall Posts Rated:
307307
More efficient in terms of training more players yes. However those 6 players will see pops in passing skills slower so it would be less efficient in terms of skill increases.

Now, I suppose if you created a big enough elastic effect you could get PG+SG to train passing as fast as PG only (w/o elastic effect) for a few weeks. However, once the elastic effect wears off it will still be slower in seeing players pop skills.

From: MichTodd

This Post:
00
292269.7 in reply to 292269.6
Date: 1/28/2018 9:24:40 PM
Hemet Hooligans
III.16
Overall Posts Rated:
4646
Doesn't the elastic effect kind of even out in the wash , so to speak?

This Post:
00
292269.8 in reply to 292269.5
Date: 1/29/2018 1:27:58 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
32293229
So if i train one player PG, 3 guys at 100%
Or if i train two player PG+SG, 6 guys at 70%
If this is the case...wouldn't 2 player training be more efficient?


The downside of that is that you can't train higher potential players to or even near to their cap easily if you take the two position versions of training. I did a lot of two position training when I first started over several seasons, with five guards who all ended up being good players at roughly star potential, but they weren't really ever going to be good enough to be much more than depth players once I got into II (and at the time, even in III they were really backups).

This Post:
00
292269.9 in reply to 292269.8
Date: 1/29/2018 6:56:02 PM
Hemet Hooligans
III.16
Overall Posts Rated:
4646
So basically, your saying it's about impossible to get players TSP to their farthest potential unless you go single player training. Assuming the potentials are all really good ones...mvp, hof, etc...

This Post:
00
292269.10 in reply to 292269.9
Date: 1/30/2018 5:48:43 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
120120
So basically, your saying it's about impossible to get players TSP to their farthest potential unless you go single player training. Assuming the potentials are all really good ones...mvp, hof, etc...


Yes. Even single position is it’s quite hard to cap an ATG potential player

This Post:
00
292269.11 in reply to 292269.10
Date: 1/30/2018 6:18:08 PM
Hemet Hooligans
III.16
Overall Posts Rated:
4646
Okay...thanks for the info!