It has always been a fascinating thing in theory, but uninteresting here in the buzzerbeater.
If you think about it, in reality, the player who wins the Rookie award is usually a player who made a major contribution to his team during their rookie season.
In reality we often see a rookie player being decisive for a team, much less on buzzerbeater.
A newly drawn player will have such low skills that he will hardly be used as a starter in any team, perhaps right in the last series and in a team that does not care about the ranking.
Also keep in mind that usually the young interesting players (those who in reality would be the eligible rookie of the year) here in the buzzerbeater will be chosen to be trained to the maximum, with consequent use outside the role, minutes or too long (48 min, which the evaluations because the resistance will affect a lot), or too short because it is used in rotation to make him gain form, effectively lowering the player's averages per game.
In short, whoever would win the prize would be a player perhaps a little better than the most, but poorer than those who will become someone .. it does not seem an interesting result, much less to be rewarded ..
Anche tu a caccia di "Riconoscimenti"?! Vieni in federazione: Achievements hunters (fedid=19269) (solo per supporter, se non lo sei e hai dubbi chiedi pure, spero di poter esserti di aiuto)