BuzzerBeater Forums

they have to make descisions, who is the best option and so on ;)

If a player see good oppurtunity to score, he won't pass he ball away and with high Jump Shot and less passing the chanche off succes would often be higher with a shoot then a pass(a example in the NBA is Iverson)

PGs in BB are greatly underestimated by many.

Care to elaborate? Just curious as I have 3 key PG's now who will be my training focus for a bit longer.... I dont want to convert them all into SG's but I do need to give them more JS.... is there any reason I would be better off forgoing this for more passing? How would that help me?

I believe that on average PG's take too many shots and it cant just be down to the quality and the reason you need a PG with high JS/JR is because if the other matchups on the court are equal the he will just end up having a go himself....

in my opinion a balanced player is always better.

example: if his jumpshot is far superior to his passing, he wil shoot all the time. Should he get a decent defender on him, your team will not score much.
If his passing is very dominant, he will not try to shoot, but rather pass the ball all the time. If he has an average defender on him, or even a weaker, this will cost you points as your other players might be struggling against better defense.

If he has equal skills for both shot and passing, he can choose, and is likely to pick the best option most of the times.

Much depends on your opponent ofcourse, but with a balanced player your team will be able to adapt to most situations.

So I'd try to train him in all his major skills as equally as possible.

EDITED: what I think he meant by underestimating PGs is that most managers will rely on their SG for outside, and PF and C for inside play and see the SF to glue the team together and fill in for the gaps in either outside or inside while they neglect the importance of the PG in any case, which is not so smart, especially with outside focus, but also a little when playing inside.

Last edited by Lord of Doom at 10/24/2008 8:29:50 AM

I know PGs are suppose to assist more than shoot but my 2 PGs have been quite selfish suddenly with them preferring to score than pass. I have been training Jump Shot for Guards. Is this affecting the way my PGs play? If I train them in passing and their passing gets higher than their shooting skills will they decide to pass instead? Or should I just train them into SGs?

So is it fair to say then that perhaps the GE needs to be tweaked to further differentiate the roles of the SG/PG? I guess the same can be true of the C/PF role?

Overall too many C's playing makeshift PF's and too many SG's playing makeshift PG.

well, if a coach wants to play without PG and PF, and wants to play 2 SG and 2 C, then who will say he will do a bad thing?

Maybe in the NBA they should try to play a team like this: 1PG , 2SG and 2C for outside oriented teams, and 2PG and 3C for inside oriented teams.
I wonder what would happen. :þ

Every player on the floor is equally capable of lighting it up on any given night. Factors effect his performance obviously, but just because he is a pg doesn't mean he can't score (look at Chris Paul, or Mike Bibby) some are offensively challenged ( like Jason Kidd or my own teams Mate Mistic) but don't let the pg fool you. ( Look at my team, everyone (except Mate of course) usually has at least ten points and rarely has over 25. The other pg usually has at least 20)