BuzzerBeater Forums

Suggestions > Solutions to current problems.

Solutions to current problems.

Set priority
Show messages by
From: Manouche

This Post:
11
219156.10 in reply to 219156.1
Date: 6/3/2012 6:50:29 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
699699
Thank you Kukoc for these well-thought out and well-put suggestions.

I like 1. It could include staff salaries too. It makes sense to have to balance revenues and expenses.
The penalty could be lower as I think the possibility to overspend for a while should still remain.

I don't think 2 and generally salary floors are necessary or efficient.
Hit the wallet ! Teams who field blatantly understrength lineups should be severely hit on their income, arena receipts and merch. It's conceivable to cut TV rights too, it would need more thinking and analysis on the consequences, so I'd be careful touching it.
This in conjunction with 1 would lower the team average total income for the next seasons and would be enough to negate the point of tanking.

I don't like 3. Most transfers are legit, why hurt everyone ? And would it work ? I can see ways around it and I am not the wicked kind. Both problems you want to fight with this are minor in my eyes and the solution is too drastic and with fallouts on the market difficult to predict.

Suggestion 4 is not necessary with your 1 and my 2.


Message deleted
Message deleted
From: Axis123

This Post:
00
219156.13 in reply to 219156.11
Date: 6/11/2012 4:59:41 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
299299
I am a bit baffled about the activity answering this poll. This is a 2 week poll, so the time is not up yet, but 19 responces is really low. I do feel that this poll has enough options for everyone. Does this mean only 19 people bothered to read this through or is there only 19 users total, reading suggestion forums.

Not everyone can be bothered to input.

This Post:
00
219156.14 in reply to 219156.3
Date: 6/11/2012 5:01:41 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
299299
i like only point 3.

Likewise.

From: GM-hrudey

This Post:
00
219156.15 in reply to 219156.11
Date: 6/11/2012 7:50:27 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
32293229
I am a bit baffled about the activity answering this poll. This is a 2 week poll, so the time is not up yet, but 19 responces is really low. I do feel that this poll has enough options for everyone. Does this mean only 19 people bothered to read this through or is there only 19 users total, reading suggestion forums.


I personally read it and didn't vote just because I think the poll itself isn't ideally framed. Discussing the individual suggestions instead would be preferable in my mind, rather than an aggregation of how many we agreed with. That, and it's much less fun to have an "I'm agree" post instead of an argument. ;)

Message deleted
This Post:
00
219156.19 in reply to 219156.15
Date: 6/12/2012 10:09:03 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
i deleted some post here since we should concentrate on the suggestion instead of the polling function in the suggestion board.

This Post:
00
219156.20 in reply to 219156.19
Date: 6/12/2012 10:18:50 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
299299
i deleted some post here since we should concentrate on the suggestion instead of the polling function in the suggestion board.

I think that's really sad because what he said was very valuable. I hope he kept the text so he can repost it somewhere else.

Advertisement