BuzzerBeater Forums

Non-BB Global (English) > Is OD too cheap for its' effect?

Is OD too cheap for its' effect?

Set priority
Show messages by
From: Koperboy

This Post:
00
249848.10 in reply to 249848.9
Date: 10/10/2013 6:10:45 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
952952
Oh my god, man...you are reading into my posts whatever you want to read, right?

If Kobe is such a great teammate, than why didn't Shaq and Howard stayed in LA? Why doesn't he take a paycut to win a championship? Who is responsible for colapse against Detroit Pistons in the finals? Shaq went to Miami, won a championship. Howard went to Houston - probably won't win a champinship, at least not this year, but is positioned much better than Lakers are at the moment. Etc. etc.

NBA all teams, DPOY, Coach of the year...you should know better than me that's pretty irrelevant. George Karl coach of the year? Pff, come on. At least Popovich and Thibodeau deserved that award more. Stats are similar, and Houston made the playoffs solely on Harden's shoulders. Who did he have to work with? Lin coming off an injury, offensive-challenged Asik, 2nd round pick Parsons (although he is outplaying his contract like a madman) and Patterson for PF (after he was traded, they had rookies at PF spot). And he didn't have any training camp to get to know his team, started for first time in his career...pretty good if you ask me. He probably won't surpass Kobe either in championships or in statistics, but he may enter Top5 SGs ever if he stays in this path.

I didn't say Harden was top defensive player, you made that up (like 80% of your post). I said he was a good defender.

I didn't say Paul George is bad defender, I said he's an elite defender with a decent offensive game.

Bazemore, Beverly...those are defensive specialists and energy guys who enter the game from bench and have low minutes with high impact on the game. Of course they won't ever be considered for top defensive teams if they have limited minutes. But that doesn't mean they are bad defenders.

everal people in the NBa are better defender's than Harden

Again, I didn't say that. You made that up.

Several people are better scorers.

Bryant, Durant, Melo and LeBron. That's "several" to you?

But challenging Kobe and Michael Jordan for best SG in history list...I think not.

Again...didn't say that. You made that up.

If you want to have a conversation, don't go making up stuff.

From: Koperboy

This Post:
00
249848.12 in reply to 249848.11
Date: 10/10/2013 7:29:57 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
952952
I'm not an english native speaker, but even I know "several" depends on context. "Several miles" might differ between a sailor and a marathon runner, don't you think? So in a 450 player league, "several" should be at least 10, if not more. Instead it's four. Great nitpicking, dude!

Kobe is one of the greatest players (I didn't deny that, so you're making stuff up again), placed perfectly into the league (after MJ left the game so he couldn't bother him - ask Malone and Barkley) and into the richest franchise in NBA who couldn't care less if it goes over the cap. He was constantly putting up huge numbers. Last year he was one of the best players in the league at age of 33 IIRC. Lakers could buy virutally anyone outside of Duncan and few other players.

So...team with most money, best player in the game at that time, best coach and brightest lights in the whole USA. In 17y career, he wins...5 rings. Put MJ, Magic or Bird in his place and imagine what could happen. And THAT'S what bothers me with Kobe. Unfulfilled potential!
Nobody can argue that 5 rings is crap. 5 rings means greatness. But imagine if Jordan won "only" 2-3 rings despite being so dominant. Would you still call him GOAT?

(whilst giving him NO credit for their successes).

That's another thing you made up. Dude, your reading comprehension seriously sucks.

that Westbrook is the better player and scorer.

Again taken out of context. Defenses have to guard Durant first and then comes Westbrook. Who is first target of all defenses in Houston? How would Westbrook fare in Harden's spot?

I agree maybe Curry could be in front of Harden, but let's see first how that ankle holds up, shall we? Because if he can get one outstanding season each three years, that doesn't cut it for me.

In the end, let me be clear all that I write are my OPINIONS and not FACTS. You are telling me I know nothing about Kobe because I wasn't there, I wasn't his teammate...hey, neither were you, so how can you say he is a great team player? For every example you show me I can show you two or three.

This Post:
11
249848.13 in reply to 249848.12
Date: 10/10/2013 8:06:04 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
32293229
I'm convinced that it's time for Marin to do something about the NBA's salary formula.

From: Koperboy

This Post:
00
249848.15 in reply to 249848.14
Date: 10/10/2013 10:23:52 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
952952
I'll admit one thing: Didn't know several would mean more then two or three, but not many.

Yes I tihnk Bird would win more championships than Kobe if he'd been paired with Shaq, then Gasol and Howard at the end. That's my opinion. Your opinion differs from that. Are you really such an ass to shoot down a man whenever he states an opinion that differs from yours? Now let's see why didn't Bird win that many championships...oh, maybe because some Magic Johnson guy? who did Bryant have to play against? Spurs, Detroit, Miami...? Not even going into whole LA-Sacramento rigged series.

I never said Harden is better than Kobe. I said he's equal at this point in time (of course Kobe is 10 years older, so that says something about Kobe). Your reading comprehension...eh, it's useless. You will see what you want to see and bark and think nobody knows more NBA than you.

You lost major points in my eyes Wolph. I know you don't care, so whatever. I won't post anything else in this thread because debating with you is not possible. As far as I'm concerned, a GM or a MOD can lock this thread.

This Post:
00
249848.19 in reply to 249848.6
Date: 10/11/2013 12:29:36 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
103103
And in his first season as a starter, night in and night out guarded by team's best defenders, his stats were:
25.9 PPG, 4.9 RB, 5.8 AST, 1.8 STL, 44% for 2, 37% for 3, 85% FT.

Compare it with Bryant at age of 23:
25.2 PGG, 5.5 RB, 5.5 AST, 1.5 STL, 46% for 2, 25% for 3, 83% FT

and you can see that so far they are equal. Not to mention Bryant has always been the cancer for his team, while Harden is not. But we'll have to wait for Harden's career to finish to be able to compare these two players correctly.




Not a very fair comparison. At age 23 Kobe had to share the ball with Shaq, basically Kobe was the 2nd offensive option. Harden was option 1 (and 2....and 3) on Houston last year. Comparing stats is the casual fan's way of comparing players. Kobe in his prime is hands down a better player than Harden last year, regardless of stats. Bryant the Cancer of his team? A true Kobe hater statement without much merit. Kobe has been the driving force for the team, he has put fierceness in players (like Gasol) to get them to elevate their game. Look at several guys who played Solid with Kobe, moved on to other teams to be mediocre. Guys like Walton, Odom, Ariza, just to name a few. If Kobe is a cancer I would like to order 3 plates of cancer please.

Advertisement