BuzzerBeater Forums

If you think the charlotte bobcat could get every euro title unbeaten in every euro league out here in the world. Then I say again laughable. Who is to sit here and say which is the premiere league of the world. Nba is the most popular not , a lot of euro teams have better talent.. Usa talent lose the Olympics versus those same players your saying are weak.

Tell you what - if you think there's another league that's superior in quality to the NBA, please make that argument. The simple fact is that the best players in the world end up in that league because, you know, it's the premier basketball league in the world. And I'm not belittling the European players at all, nor the European leagues - they have a fine standard of play and obviously develop great players.

It has nothing to do with stupid mistakes of the managers. It have every thing to do with dictating other ways of play. How many rules will they force down on lower leagues teams throat for sake of fair ness. Then you expect them to stay around? Let be realistic here. Since your dwelling in opinions of your mind when presented the facts.. Your in league 2. So I doubt you give damn about a rules that effect league 4 and below..

I highly doubt you care or give damn because you lined your team with u21 like players and some bought , but dont want anyone to say anything about it. You don't any one to dictate your finances, you don't anyone to touch what you started. But its ok to do that to other's below you in lower divisions.

I am going to demonstrate restraint here, because there's no need to put our valued GMs/EGMs through the hassle that typing my raw impressions would cause. (And even less-valued EGMs like Perpete probably don't deserve that ). All that I will say is that if you think I support this rule because it might keep you down, you're ridiculous - you do a very effective job of keeping yourself down. All I will say is that my entire roster's salary when I promoted from IV was 133k - which you're topping with just your top three players - and you're complaining because you can't buy a player whose individual salary is over 150k? I have to admit, if it were just about keeping you down, I'd much rather let you waste your money on ridiculous salaries like that - it'd be fun to see how much money you could lose trying to keep yourself in III. But too many new teams have bought too many big salary guys and had their team torpedoed to make it worthwhile.

No one can make it but a few, it has nothing to do with how I play. But thats everything to do withlower league teams being able win games in a fair manner. So what ,!! they bought a player for 5 million, who earned that money? who are you and many other to say its not fair and what is fair for lower league teams?. Who put them in charge of lower league finances?

You can buy a player for $20M, if you want, as long as his salary is under 150k/week (though, obviously, if you overbid ridiculously you can be fined or banned, though don't let that stop you!). You can use your precious money however you like, except that in this one particular instance you can't buy players whose salary is simply far too great for your level of competition.

Incidentally, communism would be where all of the arena revenues/ transfer revenues / wages / etc would be allocated evenly throughout the league, and players would be assigned to teams based on what that team needs. It's not a synonym for an economic decision you don't agree with, no matter how many blowhards on talk radio may lead one to believe otherwise.

1S0 Is not enough for any good player on BB in my opinion. Good player start at 250k or better.

You clearly miss that the 150k is the weekly salary limit, not the transfer price limit.

I mean, unless you honestly think that only players with 250k+ salary per week in BB are good players. I think everyone is already quite impressed with darkonza's B3 title, but to think he did it without a single good player (and only one player you couldn't buy yourself, even!) would be really shocking:
(65653784)

I think you should take pride in the fact that 7 of the 8 players on the B3 champions' championship lineup would sign for your team, but clearly that's not good enough for you.

Your definition of small market in the nba way off man. You don't know why player managers left and went bankrupt. Did they leave a team suicide note. Did BB give them team survey upon leaving .Tell me another mr Perpete. I find it funny.

Some would blame un even tactic strength and not making enough money for player leaving BB. But I guess the wind is blowing to hard in bb staff ears to hear that one complaint.. No one asked for anyone/anything for free.

I'm said simple and easy to understand how can BB dictate lower league team salary to buy and not Everyone elses.. The prices are out of control and none is making any money.. How long as this game been around 26 season so that what 5-7 yrs of BB economy? Ever heard of time line wage increases to afford. Kind of like making $4.50cent a hour when the rent is $2500.oo a month. People are going to illegal mean to keep roof over the head of them../

That's how I see it.. A tax adjustment wont do anything, because again cost to afford is to high.. A small market team is looking to become a big market team( meaning getting more expensive players and better players to gain income in the market) its based on talent and income. Btw no D-league team has become a Nba team. So to compare div team to that is funny. When was the last time the Boston Celtics was a D league team. Only player come up to nba from/ to d-league to regain skills or as player punishment from management staff.

So back to my point a 100K$ player is not good enough with the way the BB economy going in the time line. I don't care what usa did with 150K roster. Those nt plyer get extra training and good managers, and lower div player don't have the luxury, they didn't have pay for them.

Ill say your nba knowledge is not so great, but im no guru either..

But you still didn't answer my question.? How is it false for a team not to take older veteran at a high cost.? you know some d league players get nba salary if they was a lottery pick. you know this right.?

Last edited by Mr. Glass at 1/9/2014 3:48:05 PM

So back to my point a 100K$ player is not good enough with the way the BB economy going in the time line. I don't care what usa did with 150K roster.

The B3 champion's final lineup, where he won the ultimate club championship in this game, had 7 of his 8 players with salaries under 150k and the other at 167k. I'm going out on a limb here, but I think that being able to purchase players up to the quality of the B3 champions should be more than adequate to withstand the rigors of USA IV.30, though of course some of the finest managers in the game have aspired to the B3 and will never come close to winning IV.30.

have they won it?? go look and see

have they won it?? go look and see

(65653784)

There's the finall game of the B3 tournament, and here's the excerpt from the news post.

Of course we have to also congratulate darkonza and his team Młoty Stargard for winning the big BuzzerBeater’s Best Tournament final against NT- 牛姐 and his team 猛牛 in one of the greatest B3 finals ever. Darkonza is the first Polish manager to win the great trophy.

The players for Mloty in the final game:
(16627667) - 167k salary C (the one player he had you couldn't get by your world rank) :
Minimum team world rank needed for player acquisition is 9576.

(15066135) - 118k salary PF
Minimum team world rank needed for player acquisition is 13529.

(15053706)- 90k salary PG
Minimum team world rank needed for player acquisition is 17744.

(16508423) - 137k salary PG
Minimum team world rank needed for player acquisition is 11628.

(18426990) - 112k salary C
Minimum team world rank needed for player acquisition is 14193.

(17061476) - 43k salary PG
Minimum team world rank needed for player acquisition is 36772

(14873254) - 73k salary PF
Minimum team world rank needed for player acquisition is 21661.

(12207307) - 112k C
Minimum team world rank needed for player acquisition is 14205.

Those players are good enough for what is undeniably one of the best managers of the game, demonstrated by his success in the highest level of competition in the game.

Other people telling me how, when, who and where I can spend MY money sounds so European. Would make more sense and be easier [my opinion] to have a debt ratio limit and if a club goes below it they are forced to sell off assets to maintain liquidity. Something like a margin call on security options in the stock market. Would be more realistic. [FYI I’m one season new with young players and not in any hurry to go out and buy players that would bust my budget. Isn’t the financials part of the “game” as well?]