BuzzerBeater Forums

Suggestions > new option: try to win by as many as possible

new option: try to win by as many as possible

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
25836.10 in reply to 25836.9
Date: 4/25/2008 5:29:23 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
You can not blame your coach for a choice that is yours. you decided to activate the option "let the coach decide". otherwise if you ask your coach to stricly stick to your choice, even with a big lead your top players will stay on the court.
For me it is a false problem.

This Post:
00
25836.11 in reply to 25836.10
Date: 4/26/2008 4:27:42 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
my coach didn't do that, even with strictly follow deph chart he will bring the second lineup with a high lead.

And this changng tactic leads to curious decisions, so i making my lineup for the game this evening optimized for a high loss becuase i don't want to risk that my coach takes my trainees out of the game - and in my scrimmage it is the same procedere.

From: Ehud

This Post:
00
25836.12 in reply to 25836.11
Date: 4/27/2008 2:57:14 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
274274
You can allways try and register only 8 player give or take to the game . . .

I do it a lot in my scrimming (I was didn't want to risk any of the stars)

One time my couch gave a "lucky fan" some minutes !


"Did you miss me??? - "With every bullet so far..." Al Bundy
From: CrazyEye

To: Ehud
This Post:
00
25836.13 in reply to 25836.12
Date: 4/27/2008 2:59:38 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
yeah, but if i register 8 players and it comes to a blow out, sometimes the starters without backup get replaced ... if i play with 8 players and loose that happens only if they are in foul trouble.

From: johny13

To: Ehud
This Post:
00
25836.14 in reply to 25836.12
Date: 4/27/2008 9:55:38 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
99
The idea when you want to win by a huge difference in order to improve your point average is also to win the game...

If you have only 8 players registered you simply make them play more (have the Lucky fan appear even) that won;t help you get a big difference, and might even make you lose a game that you would otherwhise have won.

This Post:
00
25836.15 in reply to 25836.8
Date: 4/28/2008 1:38:34 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
196196
I like the idea, and if someone wants to win by 50 instead of 30 and screw their training, so be it.

I totally agree with you Juice...



Yeah - I third it...

It doesnt have to be for the end of the season it can be thrown in gradually at any time... (doesnt make sense to TIE and try win by loads) but in games against opposition that might TIE against you a normal and decimate order to win by 50+ will teach others perhaps not to try & store enthusiasm!

If this then got linked to fan attendence it would become even more interesting...if normalling/ct'ing and winning by 50+ got more fans coming each week than winning by 5 TIE - I'd do everything possible to get more bums on seats and more $$$$


This Post:
00
25836.17 in reply to 25836.16
Date: 5/30/2008 9:23:38 AM
AS Barroom Heroes
II.1
Overall Posts Rated:
10141014
Second Team:
Lone Pine Productions
Definitely. Great idea.

It actually helps with the training because you have more control over what the coach does.

This Post:
00
25836.18 in reply to 25836.17
Date: 5/30/2008 10:42:56 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
224224
Definitely. Great idea.

It actually helps with the training because you have more control over what the coach does.

There is one problem though. From what I understand, the real goal this isn't necessarily (only) to protect your starters -- it is also trying to make the game a bit more newbie friendly, and protect brand new teams from getting beat by 80 points.

I agree that there are games in which one would like that the blowout rule didn't kick in, but that might defeat its original purpose.

"I don't know half of you half as well as I should like; and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve."
This Post:
00
25836.19 in reply to 25836.18
Date: 5/30/2008 10:54:20 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
Definitely. Great idea.

It actually helps with the training because you have more control over what the coach does.

There is one problem though. From what I understand, the real goal this isn't necessarily (only) to protect your starters -- it is also trying to make the game a bit more newbie friendly, and protect brand new teams from getting beat by 80 points.

I agree that there are games in which one would like that the blowout rule didn't kick in, but that might defeat its original purpose.



But if you llok at the game by itself, the blowout rule is useless in this diszipline ...

Because you can't play your strongers players every game as a starter, with good luck you could do that in 2 games but more often you play one game with your best pf and one or two with him as backup.

This Post:
00
25836.20 in reply to 25836.19
Date: 5/30/2008 11:20:04 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
224224
Definitely. Great idea.

It actually helps with the training because you have more control over what the coach does.

There is one problem though. From what I understand, the real goal this isn't necessarily (only) to protect your starters -- it is also trying to make the game a bit more newbie friendly, and protect brand new teams from getting beat by 80 points.

I agree that there are games in which one would like that the blowout rule didn't kick in, but that might defeat its original purpose.



But if you llok at the game by itself, the blowout rule is useless in this diszipline ...

Because you can't play your strongers players every game as a starter, with good luck you could do that in 2 games but more often you play one game with your best pf and one or two with him as backup.

This doesn't invalidate the purpose of the rule that I mentioned.

Last edited by GM-kozlodoev at 5/30/2008 11:20:19 AM

"I don't know half of you half as well as I should like; and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve."
Advertisement