"So, as of this season, attendance income of the third match is replaced with rewards for both the league winner and the runner up, whether or not there ends up being a tie-breaker game. The amount of the reward should be pretty similar to the average tie-breaker match income, so teams don’t lose out under this new system."
1. Equal rewards to each team? Or pro-rated according to the relative sizes of the two arenas?
2. Or, the attendance for games one and two are increased by 50%, and there is
no attendance money for game three??? That fits perfectly the description of "whether or not there ends up being a tie-breaker game" ... and "pretty similar to the average tie-breaker match income."
3. Arenas already usually sell out for the finals. Will the size of the arenas have to be 50% bigger to allow such a big boost? Or, put another way, if one or both of the arenas isn't large enough, will that limit the reward?
Thanks for any clarification you can offer.