Here's a question. Obviously it's up to you if you wish to divulge, but do you find it better if you set a minimum price on a player for transfer,or just put the initial price at 0 (or 1000, w/e it is)? I've always gone with the price at 0 as to get more interest from a larger pool of players. It seems that when I put in a min price, I over value players, or they just don't sell for what i perceive their value being. Anyone care to share?
What the hell, you guys are slipping. We've made it two games into the season, and nobody has bothered to hypothesize who might win the league? For shame.Favorites to win the Big 8:Hoosiers, Jests*Favorites to win the Great 8:Hobos, QuakersFinals:Methinks Hobos finally wins the whole shebang.Favorites to make impressive Tournament runs:TFSBCTRiverdogsPBSFavorites to spend next season in III:Contortionistsabout 5 other teams* - Dependent upon how many more games they drop while Amorrortu is injured, and what they do with the 50k twins