I don't like when discussions are about things being black or white.The draft system was sensibly improved with the changes made a few seasons ago and we are all happy about it. But I agree that the way players are generated could be easily enhanced. This would make the current choice less based on luck and would reduce the anomaly of 18yo draftees sold for 4M$ or so.A few examples:- Star rating should be based not only on salary but also on skills (secondary, as primary are already included in salary).*- 19yo draftees could be slightly better, on average, than 18yo (this is realistic too).- 18yo draftees with high potential could be limited to salary lower than 5k (or to not ideal skill sets).* i.e. a SG with high rebounding will have a higher salary than a SG with low rebounding but much better passing, IS and ID, and I am pretty sure we would all prefer the second one.
Are you saying that in many leagues, many teams all have about the same number of NT-players from their own country?
Are you saying that in many leagues, many teams all have about the same number of NT-players from their own country?My basilar math knowledge says that 0 is a number...Ned does not have any player that can really arrive in NT,where do you see it??If you says that you see Caputi,it's just a LOLAnd it's true that ned's best players are foreigners,but ned has some god italian players,and 1 NT player.....
p.s. I'd also support a little improvement for 19 yr old drafts, since the difference between an 18 yr old and 19 yr old draft is too big atm.
He has 2 players from the draft that he trained, one with high salary. You have 2 italian players, not from your draft and with a low salary.
He has 2 players from the draft that he trained, one with high salary. You have 2 italian players, not from your draft and with a low salary. YOU SAY THAT God bless you and thanks!