BuzzerBeater Forums

I provided a simple calculation of what a level 7 coach actually gives you in terms of training based on a pure guess about his effect. Which particular part of it did you not like?

Also, I didn't actually berate anyone, and as you might have noticed we've figured the situation out since then.

From: GM-kozlodoev
To: bobans 381.781 in reply to 381.780
Date: 22/10/2008 08:57:43 any new data with the new staff system changes? what is the impact of lvl 7 trainer on training speed?

You don't really expect people to figure this out after 1 week of training with the new staff now, do you?


Here was your reaction to an innocent poster.

What I dont like is again you are basing your argument as you admit on your own guess.... so when you say it is not worth it.. this is based on your guess.. some others believe it or not have guessed differently (rightly or wrongly as we all know is not yet known although hinted at by the BB team who say that 1.5mil is over the odds)

Even if this figure is closer to 500k or 1mil - i have said that 2-3 successful day trades (or normal training / selling) will easily get you this and for a new team starting out they could effectively write off their first season and if they imagine starting even later then the money they generate could help them obtain one of these trainers which will surely bring them back above the growth curve by season 3/4....

Sure. Everyone is free to disagree and do the same calculations I did replacing 10% with whatever number they see fit and draw their own conclusions. Regretfully, most people are not interested in doing that.

If you think that a level 7 coach will train your players 20% or 50% faster, by all means, go dump all your savings in getting one. I picked the first number I thought of, which would have been on the high end of what I would have used, were I designing the system.

If you have a GM next to your name you should be careful in posting. Many people believe that you actually know something about the game and take what you post as fact. When, in fact, what you post is a guess but is presented with pompous bluster and condescension it only hurts the community.

I'll just add my comment that the new staff system hurts my enjoyment of the game rather than helps it.

The old system was fine, and made much more sense from a standpoint of logic.

If you have a GM next to your name you should be careful in posting. Many people believe that you actually know something about the game and take what you post as fact. When, in fact, what you post is a guess but is presented with pompous bluster and condescension it only hurts the community.

You should read more carefully:

Obviously, I have no inside information on the exact detail

(53381.94)

The issue isn't as much reading carefully as your general tone. You respond to posters in a condescending manner quite often. Additionally, if you say you have no inside information once in a thread, but berate other users for their opinions 10 times, it lessens the impact of your disclaimer.

You, as well as everyone else around, are welcome to your opinion.

The issue isn't as much reading carefully as your general tone. You respond to posters in a condescending manner quite often. Additionally, if you say you have no inside information once in a thread, but berate other users for their opinions 10 times, it lessens the impact of your disclaimer.

You, as well as everyone else around, are welcome to your opinion.

But only as long as it doesnt conflict with yours!

The issue isn't as much reading carefully as your general tone. You respond to posters in a condescending manner quite often. Additionally, if you say you have no inside information once in a thread, but berate other users for their opinions 10 times, it lessens the impact of your disclaimer.

You, as well as everyone else around, are welcome to your opinion.

But only as long as it doesnt conflict with yours!

I can't do much about it if it does, can I?