BuzzerBeater Forums

Yes, if it had been only him and not We, too that I was training, his skillset would look definitely different. But it‘s still not that bad and it‘s good enough to play on the NT already. And the good thing is: he‘s going to get a lot better, still

Now even playing LI doesn't really keep We from being topscorer Sure, it's not 40+ points, but at least something ... would be great if he managed to get a couple more points to enter the Top 10 of all-time single-season points (again). I guess the 373 points are a bit far away at the moment, but maybe he'll get close to his current NT-teammate Sang-Bum Lee at 290+ points

Kazakhstan U21 107 - 124 Hanguk U21
(56765)

Well Kang surely had a game to cement himself in the record books

A shame he will kick out his previous performance out of the top 10
Good idea would be to at least get top 9.

Yes, that's what I thought, too. But well ... he'll have a couple more seasons to aim for the top spot. If you play more outside oriented tactics, he should be in for a couple of good scoring seasons

Jung-Shik Choi got into the top 10 games in the NT. It's extremely close for the top 10 with several players at 137/135/133/133/133/132/132. Only two of those are active in the NT, Choi playing his very last games, not sure this 132nd (or 133rd if not updated) is his last one ever. He beneficiated from high GS for him and low GS for others (and some lobbying).

Yes, that's quite close there. Probably because we've got the same NT manager who always favors the same players But seriously ... amazing how many players get to around 120-140 NT games ... not all of them are international superstars, but I guess Baek was pretty good in his time, Nam in his prime, Sang-Bum Lee also. Lim probably not, but seeing him on the TL, his skillset was suppesedly too good for a PA, don't know how you did that^^ Seong-Bum Kim isn't really a world-class Center, but at least he got some OD and almost always seems to have had good GS. And I guess there was some SF called Park (I don't remember his first names), he played for Busan Thunder. He wasn't all too bad, either if I'm not mistaken.

Would have been nice if all of them could have played together. Nam and Baek as starters at PF and C, Kim as backup. Park as SF-starter, Lee as PG ... and We as SG. Woud be quite a good team. Probably still lacking a world-class SF, but still pretty great

And subbing in some of those record-NT-players ... but hey, we're working on getting you a team that's able to perform well both backcourt and frontcourt at the same time

a pretty mediocre draft in terms of high potential players
we'll see which ones come on the market

What happened? Forgot to set a lineup right before the elections? Doesn’t look all that good

Yup, I fucked up...

I started a new job last week, a bit stressful, and I forgot to prepare the game. I even told to Gangnam who was going to play on Friday, but never made the orders.

Sorry to everyone.

Too bad. Wasn’t that supposed to be the record 15th game for a couple of players? And also: why don’t you have a standard lineup? A lot of questions to be answered. Those are going to be hard elections. Already only 50% approval and now something like that...statsman and I will support you, of course. But I guess you still won‘t get a single vote out if that support.

And seriously: just make sure that next season Marin screws the engine up and we‘ll get another extra game. Then we‘ll get those record 15 games and all‘s well. But it‘s still not nice - We was aiming to score 70+ points in that game. He told me. And I believe him

And even more seriously: can happen. Even I have forgotten to set a lineup in the past. Especially when there are other things like a new job involved. Even though BB is dead serious, I guess it‘s ok to screw up from time to time because of RL.

And now: get reelected. Would like that to be your last game. And I also wouldn’t like to take over the team because then just my former trainees would play. And apart from Kim and We and maybe that part-time C-trainee Jung, no one wants to see those (very) old or (rather) weak trainees