BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > coachParrot - assistant tool

coachParrot - assistant tool

Set priority
Show messages by
From: Marot

This Post:
00
119279.106 in reply to 119279.105
Date: 3/23/2010 1:54:46 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
916916
Thanks againg for your job,awesome i Im really getting used to use it, for my team and for our nt.



Big thanks ¡

From: AZ

This Post:
00
119279.107 in reply to 119279.101
Date: 4/9/2010 1:20:27 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
134134
Any news on whether or not it will be compatible with excel in the future?

From: Bilyb

This Post:
00
119279.109 in reply to 119279.108
Date: 4/10/2010 7:24:28 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
I've drafted a player that I've decided to build my team around, but I'm sticking with mostly two-position training as I'm still in Div V. I've played around with the spread sheet basing his individual training on focusing at different positions and it's obvious his highest salary will come from basing it on SG... although he never turns into a SG as his strongest position. That doesn't bother me, as the support players I am training along with him are a PG and a SF.

I also tried to force the development toward the Princeton Offense, but no matter how much I adjusted the Data Page stats toward what the spreadsheet seem to favor for Princeton... The coaching Tab still never likes Princeton as the best offense - Rating Wise.

Do you think that Princeton isn't really ever going to be the best choice, regardless of the makeup of the team? Maybe it's just the rating system doesn't take into account that Princeton may somehow reduce the opponent's ratings...

I've also managed to save the Excel version of the spreadsheet in such a way that it works. I still get the out-of-rang errors when I save but they don't affect the overall integrity of the data :-)

Thanks a lot. Your work has really helped me get started on the right foot!

This Post:
00
119279.111 in reply to 119279.1
Date: 4/12/2010 9:19:38 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
887887
Hi, Josef! Greetings from Belarus! ;)

One of russian users(fomins(39580)) says there is a problem with CP scout.. I have no openoffice so the question is for you.

here are the details:
sreenshot: http://s49.radikal.ru/i124/1004/9c/56f01f5e7e4c.jpg

1. line 3 - the coach's level is 5.
2. line 22 - the player's passing skill is 5, his age is 19.
3. line 6 - required skills(passing=6)
4. Cell AD9 shows that 1 skill-up is required.
5. Cell AD10 shows that 4 weeks are necessary

But the number of required weeks is wrong. The real number should be 1-3, and the practice confirmed it. 4 weeks is too much.

This is what he said. Is he wrong or is there an error in formula?

This Post:
00
119279.113 in reply to 119279.112
Date: 4/12/2010 2:59:15 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
887887
If your friend puts a 0 instead of the current 1 in cell o28 on the Scout sheet, he'll see correct counts from now on. Will fix in a future release.

khm.. he says it didn't solve the problem. The value is 4.

This Post:
00
119279.115 in reply to 119279.114
Date: 4/13/2010 6:44:03 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
887887
Well, after he has done it once again - it is fixed. Thanks.

This Post:
00
119279.116 in reply to 119279.108
Date: 4/14/2010 3:16:47 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
the versions before 1.1 are. The scout tool will never be compatible I'm afraid.

The salary update would be, should I make a small excel version without the scout?

I'd appreciate it.
I installed openoffice just for your tool.

Great job, by the way!

Advertisement