Finally, we have an analysis of first team! It's RakBa's turn and I found 6 games with almost the same lineup. PF and C were swapped in two games, but I think it won't affect the statistics much.
RakBa's manager was kind enough to send me skills of his players. Looking at 6 outside skills, it's like this: PG is better in everything but HA than SG and SG is better in everything than SF.
SF has decent shooting, but also great inside skills (more like PF with good outside skills). PF has all outside skills at 5+, while C lacks in this area. Which is also visible when they swapped positions in two games.
First table's name is »Team %«3p (3 pointers): Out of team's 3 pointers, how many were attempted by position
2P (Jump shots): Out of team's Jump shots, how many were attempted by position
IS (Inside shots): Out of team's Inside shots, how many were attempted by position
DR (Layups): Out of team's layups, how many were attempted by position
PA( Pass attempts (not assists!)): Out of team's pass attempts, how many were attempted by position
Example: Out of 181 Jump shots taken by whole team, 29% were taken by PG, 22 % by SG etc.
POS 3P 2P IS DR PA %SH %PA
PG 49 29 10 40 34 34 34
SG 33 22 6 27 28 24 28
SF 7 22 17 15 18 15 18
PF 7 19 42 11 12 18 12
C 4 8 25 6 8 9 8
First table comment (out of all possessions, team has taken 25% of 3 pointers):
3 pointers were reserved for PG and SG spot. Given their high JR skill this is no coincidence and Game Engine (GE) decided 3 pointers will take one quarter of team's possessions. What would happen if PG and SG had low JR? I hope to find at least one, if not more such cases in one of next teams' analysis.
2 pointers were almost evenly distributed from PG to PF spot, even though PG and SG had much better jump shot than the rest of the team.
PF and C heavily lead in Inside shots. I expected a bit more from SF.
Pass attempts: Both PG and SG have great passing skill and SF doesn't trail by much. This is nicely reflected in distribution of pass attempts.
2nd table is »Individual %« and shows what each position has been doing in his possessoins (it takes into account shot+passes attempts)
3p (3 pointers): Out of individual's shot+pass attempts, how many 3 pointers were attempted by position
2P (Jump shots): Out of individual's shot+pass attempts, how many Jump shots were attempted by position
IS (Inside shots): Out of individual's shot+pass attempts, how many Inside shots were attempted by position
DR (Layups): Out of individual's shot+pass attempts, how many Layups were attempted by position
PA( Pass attempts (not assists!)): Out of individual's shot+pass attempts, how many passes were attempted by position
Example: Out of 217 shot+pass attempts taken by PG, he took 36% of 3p attempts, 24% of 2p attempts, 4% of IS attempts, 12% of DR attempts and 24% of pass attempts.
POS 3P 2P IS DR PA
PG 36 24 4 12 24
SG 34 25 3 11 27
SF 12 38 14 9 27
PF 11 32 33 7 17
C 10 26 36 7 21
2nd table comment:
PG took 36% of 3P and 24% of both 2P and pass attempts out of his 100 possessions. I guess he wasn't a great distributer because his PA skill is worse by his JS and DR while being the same as JR. Same thing is true for all other positions.