BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > Season 25

Season 25

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
248324.109 in reply to 248324.64
Date: 9/21/2013 3:16:03 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
506506
Let me get back to you on this, but I'm 99% sure it also affects potential caps.

This Post:
00
248324.110 in reply to 248324.109
Date: 9/21/2013 3:57:13 PM
Infested Warriors
II.2
Overall Posts Rated:
775775
Let me get back to you on this, but I'm 99% sure it also affects potential caps.


Where is the parrot? It's time for you to shine once again!

From: TnT

This Post:
44
248324.112 in reply to 248324.108
Date: 9/21/2013 5:14:46 PM
Beware of Dogs
NBBA
Overall Posts Rated:
8787
First I like most of the new changes and I applaud the BB staff for their hard word. But I respectfully disagree on this tactic prediction. Unless I'm mistaken, the off/def tactics were designed to counter each other if they work as intended. The reason we are at a state where one dominant tactic exits is because some of these tactics don't work as designed and/or teams not building correct players to make full use of them. Either way, telling team not to build around one specific tactic is not the answer to this.

From: Big Dogs

To: TnT
This Post:
22
248324.113 in reply to 248324.112
Date: 9/21/2013 5:32:55 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
432432
I beg to differ. A team can still build around a specific tactic, but it could also cause the manager to think/buy players/prepare for a secondary offensive tactic. Let's say that Team A usually uses Motion, but knows that Team B adjusts its defense based on their opponent's offense. If Team A has a few players with nice secondaries, they can switch to, for example, PTB. I think it encourages tactical diversity and makes the manager think more. Sure, knowing that my opponent could guess right and beat me in a close game is a bit annoying, but it makes the game a lot more fun.

This Post:
00
248324.116 in reply to 248324.109
Date: 9/21/2013 6:34:56 PM
white snake
II.1
Overall Posts Rated:
72347234
Second Team:
Black Forest Boars
Let me get back to you on this, but I'm 99% sure it also affects potential caps.

Would that mean that a capped player (because of SB) could gain again some ups? Like 2-3 more until he reaches the same point like before the ajustement for jr and sb?

This Post:
00
248324.117 in reply to 248324.116
Date: 9/21/2013 6:57:03 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
506506
Yes, that would then be the case, indeed.

This Post:
11
248324.118 in reply to 248324.117
Date: 9/21/2013 8:01:11 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
290290
I also don't like the prediction of defense change. I really hope the BB's think about this more. For me it is like giving a weaker teams a slight boost in a game if they get it right. And better teams with better understanding of the game an even greater advantage at times.

I like being able to change the face features of the draftees. Probably one of the best things you can offer to supporters being able to customize stuff. I hope one day there will be an option to rename your draftee even for a fee. I think many would get a supporter package for a chance to do that.

From: TnT

This Post:
00
248324.119 in reply to 248324.113
Date: 9/21/2013 8:04:40 PM
Beware of Dogs
NBBA
Overall Posts Rated:
8787
I agree with you 100% on the team A adjusting to team B or vice versa ... But those adjustments are tactics adjustments and should stay within that realm. Why need a phantom boost?

Advertisement