BuzzerBeater Forums

Help - English > Training have to be 48+?

Training have to be 48+?

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
131787.11 in reply to 131787.5
Date: 2/17/2010 12:31:38 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
155155
48 Minutes= 100% training
47 Minutes(or less)= (give or take) 75%-90% training (or less). Definately not 1-2% (meaning no correlation)

This is been known and I believe told by a GM (legend said once there is a guy named Juice...)a few seasons ago..


And the BBs pretty much said Juice was wrong. In fact, once upon a time there was no distinction between 48 and 48+ in that table (both were 48+). The BBs did not think that the small difference was worth having a different category... But some people complained, so they fixed it.

Run of the Mill Canadian Manager
This Post:
00
131787.12 in reply to 131787.11
Date: 2/17/2010 12:41:02 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
304304
And the BBs pretty much said Juice was wrong.


He sucks.

NO ONE at this table ordered a rum & Coke
Charles: Penn has some good people
A CT? Really?
Any two will do
Any three for me
Any four will score
Any five are live
This Post:
00
131787.13 in reply to 131787.12
Date: 2/17/2010 12:43:53 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
155155


He sucks.


Well, I kind of miss him. He was right 99.9% of the time.

Run of the Mill Canadian Manager
This Post:
00
131787.14 in reply to 131787.13
Date: 2/17/2010 2:41:46 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
22
Well, I kind of miss him. He was right 99.9% of the time.


True; rumours said thats why they retired the verb "juiced"; just like in NBA when they retire numbers for players who changed basketball as it once was.

yesterday is history, tomorrow is a mystery, but today is a gift. That is why it is called the "present."
This Post:
00
131787.15 in reply to 131787.11
Date: 2/17/2010 2:56:33 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
2727
So just to clarify....there is NO difference??

This Post:
00
131787.16 in reply to 131787.15
Date: 2/17/2010 2:59:28 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
155155
So just to clarify....there is NO difference??


There is a small difference, how small is up for debate. Certainly it is not 25%, though.

My opinion = I am with Crazyeye - it is probably 1-2% from 48 to 48+.

Run of the Mill Canadian Manager
This Post:
00
131787.18 in reply to 131787.15
Date: 2/17/2010 3:25:19 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
So just to clarify....there is NO difference??


the difference is unknown, but there surely is a different and more then the percentage of the missing sekunds.

Butyou have to think about if, you give him the last minutes most likely another trainee will miss the 48 minutes about a higher margin and loose way more training.

From: Azrail

To: Edju
This Post:
00
131787.19 in reply to 131787.12
Date: 2/17/2010 5:27:03 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
259259
:-D

This Post:
00
131787.20 in reply to 131787.13
Date: 2/17/2010 6:15:18 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
196196


He sucks.


Well, I kind of miss him. He was right 99.9% of the time.


But you'll never remember those times... just the 0.1% :D

This Post:
00
131787.21 in reply to 131787.17
Date: 2/18/2010 8:43:27 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
155155

For half a minute, I'd guess a 5% -- which is a large enough difference, compared to the actual percentage of time lost (which is 2-3%), yet small enough to give almost no observable loss in training.


For half a minute, it is closer to 1% for the actual percentage lost, a full minute is more like 2-3%. ;-)

Run of the Mill Canadian Manager
Advertisement