I'm guessing the cap is based on the combination of total skill points and the value (in terms of salary) of each skill point, with a heavier weight going to total skill points. I'm pretty sure CrazyEye was saying the same thing.
not really ;) I say that there is a different weigth formula for it , and that salary is the better indication then total skillpoints. But i say that it matters for a c if he had 9 or 1 JS, even when it didn't count to the salary.
I'm curious how my capped allstar (Calis) stacks-up to other capped allstars. He has 97 skill points (not including Stamina and FT), with the highest being in JS/OD/Handling. Does anyone have an allstar with more total skill points?
(3165648) - i have one capped with 83 and he got some skill ups after the cap. Which should be a sign that it isn't just the number of skills. Sure could be also different subs in potential, but i also had an perenial allstar who had less skill points and was capped(even when the difference was small and he had secondaries).
Edit: I believe in a weighted formula liek the salary, which isn't the salary function. Maybe one general function for all position which include all skills, and make main skill more important just through their ^X part.
Last edited by CrazyEye at 6/24/2011 1:40:53 PM