BuzzerBeater Forums

Bugs, bugs, bugs > Training ran too early

Training ran too early

Set priority
Show messages by
From: tom3714

To: JON
This Post:
33
204701.11 in reply to 204701.4
Date: 12/18/2011 11:20:21 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
239239
there's not a huge difference in speed between one position and two...


uh ?
Try to train 2 positions OD and then 1 position OD. You will see huge difference I swear.

From: JON

This Post:
00
204701.12 in reply to 204701.11
Date: 12/18/2011 12:39:37 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
2828
No there isn't a huge difference.

From: jacobomd

To: JON
This Post:
00
204701.13 in reply to 204701.12
Date: 12/18/2011 12:42:42 PM
JMDCeltics
II.3
Overall Posts Rated:
32793279
I´m sorry but Tom3714 is right. There´s a BIG difference training 1 position instead 2 positions. It´s faster and you´ll see more pops.
Best regards.

From: JON

This Post:
00
204701.14 in reply to 204701.13
Date: 12/18/2011 12:50:30 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
2828
No. That's unequivocally false, not sure where you got this idea from that there is a big difference.

From: Phoenix

To: JON
This Post:
00
204701.15 in reply to 204701.12
Date: 12/18/2011 1:29:22 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
689689
No there isn't a huge difference.

Yes, there is.

Le forum francophone dédié à Buzzerbeater : (http://buzzerbeaterfrance.forumpro.fr/) Vous y trouverez conseils et partage
From: Tangosz

To: JON
This Post:
00
204701.16 in reply to 204701.14
Date: 12/18/2011 2:15:06 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
573573
The crowd sourced training analysis confirms the long held conventional wisdom that double position training has about 70% the speed of single position training.

Now, two position training can be useful for getting a crew of decent players trained up, and saving the money that you would otherwise need to spend to buy them off the TL.

But if you really want to train top flight players, you'll want to do mostly single position training so that you're players increase their skills at a sufficient rate relative to their aging process.

From: JON

This Post:
00
204701.17 in reply to 204701.16
Date: 12/18/2011 4:47:48 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
2828
Hahahahahaha, 70%... no.. where you do get this from? lmao

From: Kukoc

To: JON
This Post:
22
204701.18 in reply to 204701.17
Date: 12/18/2011 5:07:45 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
13361336
What are you trying to imply here. That training IS for C/PF is nearly the same as training IS for C? The difference is noticeable. Ofcourse the older the trainees, the smaller the difference seems to be (as the overall training effect is lower). Stop posting crap...

This Post:
00
204701.19 in reply to 204701.17
Date: 12/18/2011 6:05:49 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
209209
Hahahahahaha, 70%... no.. where you do get this from? lmao

Obvious troll is obvious.

"Air is beautiful, yet you cannot see it. It's soft, yet you cannot touch it. Air is a little like my brain." - Jean-Claude Van Damme
From: JON

This Post:
00
204701.20 in reply to 204701.18
Date: 12/18/2011 7:03:39 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
2828
I'm implying there isn't a huge difference between the two, which is true.

From: Kukoc

To: JON
This Post:
00
204701.21 in reply to 204701.17
Date: 12/18/2011 7:52:00 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
13361336
Hahahahahaha, 70%... no.. where you do get this from? lmao

crowd sourced training analysis confirms

Advertisement