BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > 2-3 zone

2-3 zone

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
206656.11 in reply to 206656.10
Date: 1/20/2012 9:14:57 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
thats sure, but the question is, what getting more important(or less) when you play 2-3 ;)

Last edited by CrazyEye at 1/20/2012 9:15:17 AM

This Post:
00
206656.12 in reply to 206656.11
Date: 1/20/2012 9:24:28 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
168168
And also what is more important for each position ;]

This Post:
00
206656.13 in reply to 206656.12
Date: 1/21/2012 3:28:41 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
432432
I used 2-3 zone against an inferior team in a league game and won. It took a foul and missed FTs by the other team to win and send it to over time though :D
buzzerbeater.com/match/36168186/boxscore.aspx

buzzerbeater.com/match/39467443/boxscore.aspx

Last edited by Big Dogs at 1/21/2012 3:30:53 PM

From: Koperboy

This Post:
11
206656.14 in reply to 206656.4
Date: 1/23/2012 2:16:30 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
952952
I actually would like to see examples where 2-3 accomplishes what M2M couldn't. Until there are games which are won by 2-3, but could be won with M2M also, this doesn't prove anything.

This Post:
00
206656.15 in reply to 206656.14
Date: 1/23/2012 5:07:33 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
20382038
u can check all my games that season to see that the biggest advantage using a 23 zone is the absolut number of shots taken by the center..thats a huge advantage ( in my eyes ) for all outside teams that crying about Look Inside for decades ;-)

This Post:
00
206656.16 in reply to 206656.15
Date: 1/23/2012 6:47:23 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
952952
I'm not sure what you mean: that you minimize shots, taken by their C?

In this season I found two of your games where you played 2-3 and are "good enough" to mention:

(39508252)

Here you could even play TIE because his team is so imbalanced: powerful inside players and poor outside players. If you played against a more balanced team, you'd probably lose. You also won because his best inside player fouled out after only 27 fouls, so it wasn't really 2-3 zone; your offense was too goid for his defense. I think you could won this game also with M2M.

(39508220)

This match is as close as possible to say "2-3 zone isn't useless". However, again I think you won because of your better offense (5-11 for 3 with Look inside is possible only against 2-3 zone) and not because of your 2-3. Actually your 4th quarter 35-11 rally was possible only because of his 2-3 zone, so this is actually a negative campaign for 2-3.

I also noticed you played a lot of 3-2 zone against opposing LI, normally against teams with weaker offensive flow. So what does this tell us?

Last edited by Koperboy at 1/23/2012 6:48:43 AM

This Post:
00
206656.17 in reply to 206656.16
Date: 1/23/2012 6:57:14 AM
Matrix Mighty Dunkers
II.4
Overall Posts Rated:
10011001
this tell us that 2-3 zone is good for weak teams

This Post:
00
206656.18 in reply to 206656.16
Date: 1/23/2012 7:05:27 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
20382038
hehe..i didnt mean my team playin the zone..but checkin my games playin against a 23 u will see that my ex center and 300k monster fanesi didnt get that much the ball as he would get it against a man man..but like i said, its only my view..i like the 23 zone..for me that zone has as much advantages like disadvantages like every other zone that BB offers us :-)

This Post:
11
206656.19 in reply to 206656.17
Date: 1/23/2012 7:05:27 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
952952
this tell us that 2-3 zone is good for weak teams


Which you can win also with M2M since they are weak, so...

This Post:
00
206656.20 in reply to 206656.19
Date: 1/23/2012 7:26:45 AM
Matrix Mighty Dunkers
II.4
Overall Posts Rated:
10011001
exactly...

Advertisement