BuzzerBeater Forums

Help - English > My draft was a complete flop!!!!!!!!!

My draft was a complete flop!!!!!!!!!

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
208292.11 in reply to 208292.8
Date: 2/6/2012 9:21:05 AM
Headless Thompson Gunners
Naismith
Overall Posts Rated:
708708
Second Team:
Canada Purple Haze BC
Hey took my shot
more than 2 seasons woth of scouting
got a 4 ball 4 potential PG
that should be good..right?
wrong
guy sucks
not sure how he gets the salary he does...oh well

This Post:
00
208292.12 in reply to 208292.8
Date: 2/6/2012 9:21:34 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
5151
I love the BB game too much to bash it. Plus, how many people you seen bash BB and come out ahead? Not like they will back up and redraft just because I'm bashing them over my injustice. If they will, then heck, I've got some things to say and want to say them to the highest ranking BB person you can find me :)

I was really just hoping to cash in on a stud trainee before I promoted, because as hard as it was to get a decent trainee in Div. 5, I can only imagin how much harder it will be at the higher levels.

This Post:
00
208292.13 in reply to 208292.11
Date: 2/6/2012 9:26:34 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
5151
Hey took my shot
more than 2 seasons woth of scouting
got a 4 ball 4 potential PG
that should be good..right?
wrong
guy sucks
not sure how he gets the salary he does...oh well

A 4 ball, 4 potential player would have been a victory for me in this draft.

Honestly, I guess I didn't do that bad. I got a $4,500 salary 18 y/o with star potential, so he can be a very good player at levels 3 thru 5 the way I see it. But I think he tops out in level 3 and becomes a bench player/scrimmage filler if I ever make it higher than Level 3.

This Post:
00
208292.14 in reply to 208292.13
Date: 2/6/2012 9:30:01 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
5151
I got a $4,500 salary 18 y/o with star potential, so he can be a very good player at levels 3 thru 5 the way I see it. But I think he tops out in level 3 and becomes a bench player/scrimmage filler if I ever make it higher than Level 3.

Would this be an accurante statement by me? Or is this $4.500K trainee with star potential not going to be a good player in Div. 3 with proper training, of course.

Here is his skills.........

Weekly salary: $ 4 510

Age: 18
Height: 6'2" / 188 cm

Jump Shot: respectable Jump Range: mediocre
Outside Def.: average Handling: average
Driving: awful Passing: average
Inside Shot: mediocre Inside Def.: average
Rebounding: inept Shot Blocking: average
Stamina: inept Free Throw: average

This Post:
00
208292.15 in reply to 208292.14
Date: 2/6/2012 9:51:21 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
455455
In Canada and many smaller countires that trainee maxed out could still be a fringer starter in D2 and a backup in D1. And he could definitely start for a D3 champion.

In the US, its probably harder to justify starting a $25-30,000 guard in D2. All the levels below D1 are stronger in the US than most other countries because of your much higher user base.

But just train him propely and he definitely has value, either to yourself or on the transfer market. Fast forward a few years and a well trained star level player is still more valuable than a poorly trained superstar prospect.

This Post:
00
208292.16 in reply to 208292.15
Date: 2/6/2012 10:03:10 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
5151
I'm studying draftees, not just for my team but for others, too. And it appears that a guard with decent skills will have a lower salary than a big man with bad skills. Why is this?

I've already seen a couple of inside players drafted with no skills worth talking about that have a starting salary more than $1,500 higher than some guard draftees with better skills. Why?

This Post:
00
208292.17 in reply to 208292.16
Date: 2/6/2012 10:07:34 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
218218
for the same reason why highest payed players in bb are centers- inside skills rises salary more than outside ones.

This Post:
00
208292.18 in reply to 208292.11
Date: 2/6/2012 10:14:44 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
5151
My draft was so disappointing, I'm drinking cold Coors Lights left over from last night's Super Bowl party. And I've not drank this early in the morning in 20+ years.

And yes, the mountains are blue. They were left outside all night, so cold isn't even the word for them.

This Post:
00
208292.19 in reply to 208292.17
Date: 2/6/2012 10:26:02 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
5151
My guess is inside players are worth more because they do produce better. My inside guys dominated this season and that's why I won. In last night's championship game, my 20 year old center trainee had 40+ points and like 16 rebounds. My forward led the league in scoring and won the MVP. Yet my guards had better skills and I even played outside based offenses from time and time without that kind of success.

Are inside guys easier to train than guards? Seems like, at least to me, guards have more skills that matter, while bigs have only a few skills that matter. Am I wrong on this?

This Post:
11
208292.20 in reply to 208292.14
Date: 2/6/2012 10:26:59 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
573573
That guy can definitely be a good player up into D3. And if you make it to D2, he could be decent depth, especially for a cup run.

As for home draftees, I suspect that a portion of their salary is returned via merchandise, but that the precise % depends on playing time. So he will still effectively have a lower salary than another guy with similar skills, but not drafted by your team.

Really though, this guy has very good starting skills, and decent height to make a nice combo guard. He has 1 awful skill (in one that's easy to train) and 1 inept (other than stamina). I personally would sure as heck train this guy up. He shouldn't be the centerpiece of your training program, but he should have a spot in it.

This Post:
00
208292.21 in reply to 208292.20
Date: 2/6/2012 10:34:59 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
5151
That guy can definitely be a good player up into D3. And if you make it to D2, he could be decent depth, especially for a cup run.

As for home draftees, I suspect that a portion of their salary is returned via merchandise, but that the precise % depends on playing time. So he will still effectively have a lower salary than another guy with similar skills, but not drafted by your team.

Really though, this guy has very good starting skills, and decent height to make a nice combo guard. He has 1 awful skill (in one that's easy to train) and 1 inept (other than stamina). I personally would sure as heck train this guy up. He shouldn't be the centerpiece of your training program, but he should have a spot in it.

So you're saying there is no reason for me to be killing the cold Coors Lights this morning to drown out my misery? :)

THanks for the info. It is greatly appreciated. I think the fact that I got a 6th man potential and a Role Player potential player, in my mind, drags down the one decent draftee I got. Heck, last season I didn't even try and got THREE perrenial all-stars in the draft.

Advertisement