BuzzerBeater
BuzzerBeater Forums
Suggestions > Bigger draftpool guarenteed 4/5 potential
Back to the Sneak Peek
Suggestions
Beginners: Weeks Remaining
13
closed
1
Player potential
5
Sound Alert (Auctions)
13
Player/Team Chemistry
17
New web interface
5
National teams COACHES (from f...
3
Foul trouble
1
Stats ANd Awards and etc.
6
Setting Number of Minutes
33
Supporter Expiration Message
3
promotion changes
3
New cup
8
Dream Team / HOF games
5
Bigger draftpool guarenteed 4/...
51
Remove the salary floor
8
Rules change
2
Add more trainers
1
Player comparison widget
1
Global Leagues
22
<
>
Favorite Folders
Bigger draftpool guarenteed 4/5 potential
Set priority
High
Normal
Low
Show messages by
Everybody
GrFlur (1)
GM-Perpete (3)
justme (3)
Manon (1)
Mickyster (2)
______ (NZ National Team) (2)
ghunter (1)
Knecht (1)
Brutus (1)
Phyr (2)
Tom2vals (1)
lvess (5)
Macobili (1)
Evaristo (7)
Maupster (2)
RandyMoss (2)
Search this Thread (Supporter Feature)
From:
______ (NZ National Team)
To:
Boston Celts
This Post:
1
282644.11
in reply to
282644.9
Date: 11/12/2016 4:24:49 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
329
But if you overfill the draft with 6-7 potential players, it just means it becomes useless to scout them because you could just pick one up off the transfer list after the draft for super cheap.
Mark Unread
Ignore User
From:
Phyr
This Post:
0
282644.13
in reply to
282644.12
Date: 11/13/2016 12:52:01 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
654
The players will low potential make no sense to me. If someone does not have the potential to make it in the NBA, they are not even in the draft. Whether someone actually fulfills their potential is another story.
Mark Unread
Ignore User
From:
______ (NZ National Team)
To:
GM-Perpete
This Post:
0
282644.18
in reply to
282644.16
Date: 11/13/2016 6:05:45 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
329
That would actually be really cool. Teams could enter the draft with either a strategy of getting a guy who's useless for now but could be a star, or a guy who's effective for now, but will never be much better.
Mark Unread
Ignore User
From:
Phyr
To:
GM-Perpete
This Post:
1
282644.19
in reply to
282644.14
Date: 11/13/2016 8:09:39 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
654
I am not advocating to increase high potential players. But anything lower than starter/star is pretty useless for training unless you boost skills.
Mark Unread
Ignore User
From:
Maupster
To:
GM-Perpete
This Post:
0
282644.20
in reply to
282644.14
Date: 11/15/2016 9:26:32 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
232
I disagree on giving more high potential though.
With a bigger pool of players and a guaranteed 9/10 pot pick its not a fact more 9/10 pot will be drafted.. Im just saying you have the chance to draft a 9/10 when investing more points into it. Longterm planning will be awarded.
Nothing is guaranteed with a 150 or so player pool to find the diamond.. But when your champions run is over, and its time to rebuild and to invest the scoutingpoints, it would be awesome for those teams to have at least the chance to rebuild with a homegrown..
Its luck now. And nothing like how it works in reality.
Last edited by Maupster at 11/15/2016 9:27:25 AM
Mark Unread
Ignore User
From:
GrFlur
To:
Maupster
This Post:
1
282644.21
in reply to
282644.20
Date: 11/15/2016 6:15:13 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
592
No real enough? Ask Greg Oden or Darko Milicic or even Andrea Bargniani... or many others that went high pick on NBA draft and were and are ... well, they are who they are...
Howl to the Moon, you won't regret it.
Mark Unread
Ignore User
Disable Emoticons and Images