BuzzerBeater Forums

Help - English > Defense Vs. Run and Gun

Defense Vs. Run and Gun

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
30484.11 in reply to 30484.10
Date: 5/14/2008 9:54:38 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
9696
If 3-2 also would have a rebounding drop i would choose 1-3-1 anyday when i would play against a perimeter minded offence...


1-3-1 has a dramatic rebounding drop, 3-2 not as much.

so actually 1-3-1 sucks.
You force them to miss their attempt, but then they are able to rebound the ball more easely. Endresult, they keep the bal, and even though they can't score, you can't either...

Since it is a tactics choice I'm probably making a mistake in this theory though, anyone could explain me how this defence is supposed to work??

They are not your friends; they dispise you. I am the only one you can count on. Trust me.
This Post:
00
30484.12 in reply to 30484.11
Date: 5/14/2008 10:00:55 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
your rebounding is dropping, but you still have a bit better chanche to get the defensiv board - but in a lot cases i will follow your argue but their is the time and place where 1-3-1 could be the better choiche.

This Post:
00
30484.13 in reply to 30484.12
Date: 5/14/2008 10:23:55 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
you rebound skill will drop and depending on how good the rebounding is of your opponent they will get more offensive rebounds. If you have 2 very good rebounders i think you will still have a lot of rebounds and if they have maybe 8 offensive rebounds more then usual but they miss 10 more shot because of the 1-3-1 the tacktick worked.

This Post:
00
30484.14 in reply to 30484.11
Date: 5/14/2008 12:13:45 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
394394
Since it is a tactics choice I'm probably making a mistake in this theory though, anyone could explain me how this defence is supposed to work??


I was wondering this yesterday and i found this http://www.coachesclipboard.net/131zonedefense.html which told me more about it.

I played a R&G team last night, probably the best in my league and i went for 1-3-1, basically becuase i was certain that he would not change his offensive tactic. I have much better inside players than him so i was confident that i would get the vast majority of rebounds still. I was at home too.

Check it out (4248824)

If i thought he might change his tactic, i would've gone for 3-2 zone.


Last edited by Calum at 5/14/2008 12:14:10 PM

This Post:
00
30484.15 in reply to 30484.14
Date: 5/14/2008 12:38:41 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
9696
hm, as I can see you team has much better players, so your team was stronger nonetheless... I am not convinced the 1-3-1 zone gave you the victory here. I'd liked to have seen the result if both teams would have equal players...

They are not your friends; they dispise you. I am the only one you can count on. Trust me.
From: CrazyEye

This Post:
00
30484.16 in reply to 30484.14
Date: 5/14/2008 12:42:32 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
what i see at this game, your opponent make a lot of TO is this normal with 1-3-1 or maybe normal for your opponent ;)

From: Calum

This Post:
00
30484.17 in reply to 30484.16
Date: 5/14/2008 1:16:18 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
394394
I think Lord of Doom has a valid point. But they do have a better outside team than me.

This is the largest TO i have seen from an opposition and I think that the tactic has got something to do with it. It almost seems like it is a mix between 3-2 and FCP. Although mostly 3-2.

From: CrazyEye

This Post:
00
30484.18 in reply to 30484.17
Date: 5/14/2008 1:22:38 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
This is the largest TO i have seen from an opposition and I think that the tactic has got something to do with it. It almost seems like it is a mix between 3-2 and FCP. Although mostly 3-2.


It seems like, maybe i go in my archiv and search my old 1-3-1 games(they are pretty old) and lok if there that uch To like here.

But i like the theory with this mix betwenn fcp and 3-2.

This Post:
00
30484.19 in reply to 30484.18
Date: 5/15/2008 11:42:47 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
9696
hm, I doubt it is. I asume BB would have added to the description for 1-3-1 that it has a higher pace, which they didn't...
(yes I asume too much, it is realy troublesome ;) )

They are not your friends; they dispise you. I am the only one you can count on. Trust me.