BuzzerBeater Forums

Suggestions > Attendance/Fan Survey Comment

Attendance/Fan Survey Comment

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
58142.11 in reply to 58142.10
Date: 11/17/2008 8:30:31 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
154154
There is a reason - as it was mentioned. Having a longer series shouldn't be much better than win in 2 games. Exstra game is extra profit. No matter if you try to lose or it just happens.

I should add that I'm not advocating anything in this case. I just think that there is a reason. If the benefit from an extra game is such a big deal I can't tell.

Last edited by docend24 at 11/17/2008 8:33:50 PM

From: chihorn
This Post:
00
58142.12 in reply to 58142.11
Date: 11/17/2008 11:08:37 PM
New York Chunks
II.2
Overall Posts Rated:
943943
For the record, I was hoping to win my Game 2. (I lost in the last minute by a lousy, stinkin' point, ruined a perfect season...)

I think the point isn't about how we'd like to make just that much more money in a Game 3. The point is that we want this game to look and fell (and smell) as real as possible, so when something smells funny, it takes away from the game, and people like me make suggestions to help make the game better (and more real).

Maybe there's a way to sniff out the tankers (i.e. a lineup with 6'-0" centers and 6'-10" point guards, or a lineup with a average salary $4,000 less than the rest of the team, etc.), and that could trigger a penalty like giving away the Game 3 ticket sales to a lesser team (or my team!) as a penalty. But that's less important to me at the moment than helping the excellent developers do an even excellenter job, and for the sake of this thread, that means making sure a Game 3 attendance is the biggest attendance of the season, which I think most of us agree would make the most sense and be the most realistic.

Don't ask what sort of Chunks they are, you probably don't want to know. Blowing Chunks since Season 4!
This Post:
00
58142.13 in reply to 58142.11
Date: 11/17/2008 11:16:05 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
458458
I lost game 2 of the finals and sold out my arena for the tie breaker, which I won. My final fan survey had 4 balls for how the team performed this season.

Once I scored a basket that still makes me laugh.
This Post:
00
58142.14 in reply to 58142.13
Date: 11/18/2008 7:49:22 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
196196
I lost game 2 of the finals and sold out my arena for the tie breaker, which I won. My final fan survey had 4 balls for how the team performed this season.


then increase your capacity ;-)

This Post:
00
58142.15 in reply to 58142.14
Date: 11/18/2008 9:07:17 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
458458
Well, that's a good suggestion except that during the regular season the arena is rarely over 75% full. Still, just this afternoon I added a few of the upper end seats.

Once I scored a basket that still makes me laugh.
This Post:
00
58142.16 in reply to 58142.15
Date: 11/26/2008 3:35:00 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
11
i think its a brain twister, imagine

game one on your home court , attendance is high and you won
game 2 ( for the sake of getting real, lets say managers do want to lose it for another home game )

game 3 attendance having hca, no matter what you say its a home court crowd on a last do or die game wouldnt they support it? how can attendance significantly . . .

imagine the blazers and the bulls championship the bulls clearly gave the game to the blazers on game 5 in portland even though they can win it, if you wer able to watch the game you would say how on earth did pippen and jordan paly in that manner.

but in game 6 its a full house in chicago!

From: Arsjitekt

This Post:
00
58142.17 in reply to 58142.16
Date: 11/27/2008 5:30:36 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
204204
Can something be done on the "I know our starplayers and aren't afraid they will be sold" rating? Can it be explained, or can there at least be a indication of which players are your starplayers according to the fans? This because i'm getting low ratings at this while I haven't put one of my 4 best players on the list. I don't think it makes al lot of sense now..

This Post:
00
58142.18 in reply to 58142.17
Date: 11/28/2008 9:21:50 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
154154
I'm afraid that everybody on roster is a starplayer. That's the problem. I guess it should make daytrading more difficult but it really sucks. Obviously placing a player on TL is enough to be screwed up by this rating.

This Post:
00
58142.19 in reply to 58142.18
Date: 11/28/2008 1:02:13 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
I recently sold one player and fired two, the rating barely went down. I'm not sure if the top players are equally counted with the others... Hopefully someone who knows the answer can tell us.

Climbing the BB-mountain. Destination: the top.
This Post:
00
58142.20 in reply to 58142.19
Date: 11/28/2008 1:47:18 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
154154
I offered four, sold none and it went down to one ball. i bought some players and fire two unsold benchwarmers.

From: CitB
This Post:
00
58142.21 in reply to 58142.20
Date: 1/4/2009 8:29:10 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
66
did not find an better thread, anyway

my problem is i played in the first match of the season against my rival, i lost in an away match, now im punished for the whole season with 0.5 balls, thats a big loss i think, maybe to big?
i can live with it but i wonder how many visitors i lost must be an huge amount i guess coz its for the all my homegames all season long...