BuzzerBeater Forums

Suggestions > Giving up and setting a TIE agreement

Giving up and setting a TIE agreement

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
64255.11 in reply to 64255.10
Date: 12/15/2008 1:24:38 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
6666
The TIE Agreement issue is an important one, up there with malaria in Africa and the Global Warming.

To continue a very poignant discussion on one of the biggest problems our country faces today, click here:
(http://www.buzzerbeater.com/BBWeb/Forum/read.aspx?thread=...)


Last edited by stogey23 at 12/15/2008 1:25:00 PM

Friends Do not Let Friends Play 2-3 Zone
This Post:
00
64255.12 in reply to 64255.11
Date: 12/15/2008 2:46:15 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
you could links threads diretly, or at least start with the link with /bbWeb/ because then all user could follow the link.

This Post:
00
64255.13 in reply to 64255.12
Date: 12/15/2008 2:47:57 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
3737
You could figure it out and post it for him.

Like so: (35222.1)

This Post:
00
64255.14 in reply to 64255.13
Date: 12/15/2008 2:55:07 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
he should learn from it, and it was easier for me to ask again ...

Instead of copying the link, pasting him in a txt , looking for thread id and put it in again here.

This Post:
00
64255.15 in reply to 64255.3
Date: 12/15/2008 6:27:40 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
154154
Like adomole, I'm a team whose opponents often TIE and/or play their second teams. I generally TIE against those teams as well, since I know I'm probably going to win even if they try their hardest.
​
If your change was implemented, I'd still win and I'd still TIE. No difference. But the weaker teams would either have their income or their enthusiasm punished.
​
So, this would build in an advantage for the stronger teams. I don't think that's a good idea.


What he said.

On second teams -since trainng needs minutes and game shape is more or less influenced by minutes played I don't see why anyone shouldn't play any players he/she wants.

This Post:
00
64255.16 in reply to 64255.10
Date: 12/15/2008 6:40:02 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
154154
Why punish yourself twice?!

This Post:
00
64255.17 in reply to 64255.16
Date: 12/16/2008 6:38:52 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
404404
Why punish yourself twice?!

??

From: Blacksword

To: Ehud
This Post:
00
64255.18 in reply to 64255.1
Date: 1/17/2009 8:00:34 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
1010
I think that instead for the 3 options now...then creating some kind of slider that lets you set the effort from 1-10 where 1=TIE and 10=CT would add some strategic depth to this. And there should be no mention in the game summary on how this was set.




I dont think mutual TIEs are that bad, except it really take away some depth of the game, as a mutual TIE is almost always an advantage for both teams.

I think giving some kind of punishment for loosing at TIE could work, because as some have already said, some people throw games away that they could have won using Normal. I have seen several games this season where Top teams in the Danish League just got away with a win even though the other team TIE'd it.

This Post:
00
64255.19 in reply to 64255.18
Date: 1/17/2009 8:50:14 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
1919
I think giving some kind of punishment for loosing at TIE could work, because as some have already said, some people throw games away that they could have won using Normal. I have seen several games this season where Top teams in the Danish League just got away with a win even though the other team TIE'd it.

Not sure I follow this. If you TIE and lose, compared to a Normal and win, then why is there a need for punishment? You've already been punished by losing a game you should've won.

This Post:
00
64255.20 in reply to 64255.19
Date: 1/17/2009 10:07:55 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
1010
Not sure I follow this. If you TIE and lose, compared to a Normal and win, then why is there a need for punishment? You've already been punished by losing a game you should've won.


Agree on this.

But I was actually thinking that if they knew they would be 'punished' if TIE'ing and loosing, maybe few teams would not just throw away games against stronger opponents.

This Post:
00
64255.21 in reply to 64255.20
Date: 1/17/2009 10:23:30 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
this team could tie there home games against weaker teams, where is the problem ;)

Advertisement