BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > Season 25

Season 25

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
248324.116 in reply to 248324.109
Date: 9/21/2013 6:34:56 PM
white snake
II.1
Overall Posts Rated:
72477247
Second Team:
Black Forest Boars
Let me get back to you on this, but I'm 99% sure it also affects potential caps.

Would that mean that a capped player (because of SB) could gain again some ups? Like 2-3 more until he reaches the same point like before the ajustement for jr and sb?

This Post:
00
248324.117 in reply to 248324.116
Date: 9/21/2013 6:57:03 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
506506
Yes, that would then be the case, indeed.

This Post:
11
248324.118 in reply to 248324.117
Date: 9/21/2013 8:01:11 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
290290
I also don't like the prediction of defense change. I really hope the BB's think about this more. For me it is like giving a weaker teams a slight boost in a game if they get it right. And better teams with better understanding of the game an even greater advantage at times.

I like being able to change the face features of the draftees. Probably one of the best things you can offer to supporters being able to customize stuff. I hope one day there will be an option to rename your draftee even for a fee. I think many would get a supporter package for a chance to do that.

From: TnT

This Post:
00
248324.119 in reply to 248324.113
Date: 9/21/2013 8:04:40 PM
Beware of Dogs
NBBA
Overall Posts Rated:
8787
I agree with you 100% on the team A adjusting to team B or vice versa ... But those adjustments are tactics adjustments and should stay within that realm. Why need a phantom boost?

From: TnT

This Post:
00
248324.120 in reply to 248324.115
Date: 9/21/2013 8:12:07 PM
Beware of Dogs
NBBA
Overall Posts Rated:
8787
Let me ask you this, wolph, since you have coaching experience. How do you adjust given you know what your opponent habits and tactics? My guess is that you will draw up different plan to gain an advantage for your team. Now your team will play better in the game ... Is it because of your game plan or is it because they know what the other team runs? I like to be believe that it mostly because of your game plan. To me this a tactic decision. Dont you agree?

From: TnT
This Post:
00
248324.121 in reply to 248324.120
Date: 9/21/2013 8:17:01 PM
Beware of Dogs
NBBA
Overall Posts Rated:
8787
Another thing that is not clear to me and I hope someone can clarify ... Is the boost a def boost only or both?

This Post:
11
248324.122 in reply to 248324.1
Date: 9/21/2013 8:25:23 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
455455
This is probably the best group of changes I've seen since I started playing the game. People may disagree on exactly how they're addressing each problem but at least they're focused on doing something about most of the bigger issues.



Last edited by Beener not Beanerz at 9/21/2013 8:30:39 PM

From: brian

This Post:
22
248324.123 in reply to 248324.101
Date: 9/21/2013 9:12:38 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
576576
So we can look and see is it good for the game as a whole to reward people for not playing cookie cutters and autotactics? Yes, it is, so while it may inconvenience me, I'm encouraged that it's still a change for the better.


Its too early to tell if these are good changes. Expect a good 4-5 seasons for teams to start making adjustments that impact the game after they are introduced. So increasing SB, decreasing the cost of JR, these things will take many seasons to bear out.

While this new guess-your-opponents-tactic feature doesn't impact LI only it is geared to address the overuse of it. For that reason this is too soon. Changes have been made that havent been fleshed out by the community yet.

In regards to fixing the GE's problem with punishing well balanced teams in certain ways (ie, backcourt outside shooters in a LI offense), fix the GE itself. We already have to swallow the bizarre effort choice that was stolen from Hattrick, now we have to bother with this crap as well?

Last edited by brian at 9/21/2013 9:14:29 PM

"Well, no ones gonna top that." - http://tinyurl.com/noigttt
This Post:
00
248324.125 in reply to 248324.108
Date: 9/22/2013 5:52:24 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
404404
The problem is that LI and M2M are the tactic that are better tuned in the game,so try to solve the dominance of one tactic only through economic side without a general improvement of GE(because,all the tactis need to be better tuned and be more flexible,LI and M2M included, I don't see why a good quality outside shot created through LI or a good quality inside shot created through motion/r&G should get such a huge penalty anyway) won't give much results

This Post:
11
248324.126 in reply to 248324.125
Date: 9/22/2013 6:05:53 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
506506
Again, I don't see how you can state the GE is the root of the tactical imbalance if so many people train players to fit only one tactic. I'm much more in the basket of DerMef who states players will be optimized for giving the highest performance per salary dollar, and then you just pick a tactic that fits that optimized player skillet. When reasoning from his point of view, the change of salary should now automatically result in different trained skillsets.

As I said in the season 24 discussion topic, if I currenlty search the tranferslist for Shotblocking minimum 15 at this moment I get 6 results only. If I search for JR minimum 15 I get 60 only. Change it to OD you'll get over 600, change it to IS you'll get over 550. To me it makes a lot of sense teams aren't able to play a 2-3 zone effectively with skillsets like this. Yet this doesn't mean it's a GE problem.

Advertisement