"long term strategy" is poor management. Since season 3 there have been major changes every season, yet people still cling to this notion that outlining some rigid goal and not deviating in the least (despite the proven fact that the game parameters will change) is a good strategy. The best strategy is to advance in a balanced and versatile fashion. Mix up your tactics, win a few games, build a few seats, buy a good player, train some youngsters, Deal with changes. Repeat.
And that is the ONE way to do it? Anyone trying a different approach to get ahead are clearly oblivious to the depth of the game? Why did I choose to build arena and not build my team?
Let's see: Because I could survive for a season or two without buying players. I started building arena to get some extra income to buy me some really good players some time in the future, accidentally taking height for the coming high salaries before there was a big buzz about it. I used multiskilled players to keep my expences down. I have read almost everything on the forums since I began playing BB.
As BB-Forrest have said, they try not to limit different strategies, but you claim that one should not try anything that deviates the meridian. Deal with changes is all we do. And we all do it. Some help us, some hurt us. I understand it as people react on swift and major changes, and when they are done on short notice. The goal should be a
balanced game where one could play around, tipping the scale one way or the other to see if you find a loophole to get the upper hand. Not that all teams must be balanced for the game to be. That's my view on it. I get your point with the way views and complaints are expressed from time to time, but it is a crucial element to get , and keep,
the game balanced.
I understand that it is hard to foresee what changes have to be done, but if the BB's could give the community some notice on what they are currently working on would give us some time to prepare, and lift a weight on many shoulders. Doesn't have to be in detail description, a heads up on what aspect of the game is enough. So if you f.ex. plan on using 2 seasons hard earned savings on a new player you could wait it out until you know what grounds you should base your aquisation on.
And btw: I am only trying to come up with solutions to make it easier for people to accept and adapt to the changes. I am not saying that is wrong or not needed. It's the process and information under way I want more accessible, not neccecarily the final outcome to be different.
Still, one should have a better chance the longer you have been playing. The main thing to get ahead as a new team is catching the big teams when they put their guard down and start to take things for granted. As time goes by the differences will get lesser as the the big old teams also have to adjust and play on the same premises. Realism anyone? Yes, they have a head start, but how do you treasure lojalty?