BuzzerBeater Forums

Suggestions > Another Enthusiasm Suggestion

Another Enthusiasm Suggestion

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
12303.12 in reply to 12303.11
Date: 1/14/2008 7:45:56 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
Everybody talks about the 'added strategy' of TIE/CT but in reality the collusion aspect between friends makes this a joke. There is no strategy when two teams decide to TIE before a game so they can gain an edge on the other teams in the league.

There fore I would prefer no enthusiasm at all. However, I doubt very much that will happen, so a change is necessary that does at least two things:

1) Eliminates the opportunity for collusion;
2) Makes the effect of CT uncertain. By that I mean a coach can't count on the benefit (that is, higher ratings for one game) but he CAN count on his team's enthusiasm level dropping.


This Post:
00
12303.13 in reply to 12303.12
Date: 1/14/2008 7:53:03 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
576576
I agree 100% with everything you are saying. Addressing those two issues was core to the ideas I proposed. What would you change to original proposal to meet your concerns?

"Well, no ones gonna top that." - http://tinyurl.com/noigttt
This Post:
00
12303.14 in reply to 12303.13
Date: 1/14/2008 8:21:18 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
4 - If you CT and win, Enthusiasm will drop less, maybe half as much Your coach just got your fired up for big game and you lost, suck! Your not quite going to get back up for the next big game the same way if you had pulled off a win in that game.


Your best idea. I could live with this.

I would like the 'benefit' of CT to be less than the benefit of a home game, however. So if you are playing a better team on the road, the better team will still get a higher net 'adjustment' (what ever that means in game terms). That would make telling a team to CT on the road is gamble. At home, it is a good bet. That would be semi-realistic for me.

This Post:
00
12303.15 in reply to 12303.14
Date: 1/14/2008 8:27:18 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
576576
with regard to home court advantage:

As it is now, I think the changes this season were to lower CT to the point that it would be about the same as home court advantage. I proposed a slight decrease in the effect of CT (maybe reduce it 1/4th what it is now, whatever, the BB's could pinpoint that), which would make it less effective than the home court advantage.

Edited by brianjames (1/14/2008 8:28:11 PM CET)

Last edited by brian at 1/14/2008 8:28:11 PM

"Well, no ones gonna top that." - http://tinyurl.com/noigttt
This Post:
00
12303.16 in reply to 12303.15
Date: 1/14/2008 10:23:52 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
6666
It would be nice to hear from the BB's that they actually read these threads and are considering changing enthusiasm.

If not, we are all just wasting our time.

Friends Do not Let Friends Play 2-3 Zone
This Post:
00
12303.17 in reply to 12303.15
Date: 1/15/2008 2:30:29 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
with regard to home court advantage:

As it is now, I think the changes this season were to lower CT to the point that it would be about the same as home court advantage. I proposed a slight decrease in the effect of CT (maybe reduce it 1/4th what it is now, whatever, the BB's could pinpoint that), which would make it less effective than the home court advantage.

Edited by brianjames (1/14/2008 8:28:11 PM CET)


Excellent.

This Post:
00
12303.19 in reply to 12303.18
Date: 1/17/2008 10:48:12 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
6666
I don't think the word has anything to do with it - it's the concept, and no I don't think a player by player solution would be good.

Friends Do not Let Friends Play 2-3 Zone
This Post:
00
12303.20 in reply to 12303.18
Date: 1/17/2008 11:02:41 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
137137
the main problem (which we inherited from HT) is that enthusiasm is not the right word for what the thing is. it's more of a "team energy level".

one possible alternative could be, as some italian users suggested, to allow the manager to TIE/CT on a per-player basis — a few players can be instructed to go as hard as they can, or just try to avoid getting hurt. my major doubt about this is that it may be too hard for new users to get right.

Edited by BB-Domenico (17/01/2008 22.40.03 CET)


Honestly, if we're going to set individual orders for each player for each match, I'd rather have more game control than a player enthusiasm setting.

Steve
Go Bruins!




From: dhoff

This Post:
00
12303.22 in reply to 12303.19
Date: 1/18/2008 12:30:21 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
1919
I don't think the word has anything to do with it - it's the concept, and no I don't think a player by player solution would be good.

Ditto.

Advertisement