BuzzerBeater Forums

Suggestions > AllStar Private League

AllStar Private League

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
142936.12 in reply to 142936.1
Date: 5/5/2010 2:53:51 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
6868
I love the idea, but i think it has to be the same as the National Teams where only the leader can see the players stats. there is no need for the other members to see the stats. It will only create problems and arguments when people give away your players stats to other users.

This Post:
00
142936.13 in reply to 142936.12
Date: 5/5/2010 4:50:15 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
179179
True, it could be subject for abuse, especially for teams where players don't know each other too well.

I guess for alliances where trust and abuse is less of an issue, they could use the private forum to post up specific players stats, etc. to allow for more information sharing.

I would see a successful alliance is one where all players contribute in terms of training, gameshape, scouting, and strategy. I was hesitant in my original idea to put too much power into the leaders hands - rather it would be ideal to have all the players involved - but you are right it would be too open to abuse.

I like how all this is fleshing out. Thanks for your contribution guys. Dunno if a lot of people read the suggestion forums, but if you like the idea, spread the word to your mates!

Maybe if we get enough support behind it, it might be a go-er!

This Post:
00
142936.14 in reply to 142936.13
Date: 5/5/2010 5:11:08 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
4949
Anything that would allow smeltz, rooney, duff duff etc to play together is a great idea !

"the labor party cant even spell surplus, let alone deliver one"
This Post:
00
142936.15 in reply to 142936.12
Date: 5/5/2010 10:22:44 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
522522
I don't agree sorry. I understand why you think that only the leader should be able to see the stats, but I think it makes the suggestion a lot less fun. I think it is vital to be able to see the stats of all the players selected to be on the team so that the teams involved in the alliance can comment on what tactics to play etc. If I join an alliance and the only thing I can see is my guy's stats and I can't comment on what tactics to play because I can't see other players stats, then there is no real point. Everyone would just want to be the leader.

This Post:
00
142936.16 in reply to 142936.9
Date: 5/6/2010 1:11:06 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
196196
Make it a 10 team limit with only 1 player per team allowed to be dressed for the match. This way no-one team dominates and everyone in the alliance feels like they are contributing to the success/failure of the team.

Great Idea!

This Post:
00
142936.18 in reply to 142936.17
Date: 5/6/2010 8:40:50 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
179179
I don't think Alliance All-Star private league games need to replace regular Private League games. They can be mutually exclusive.

From what I understand:

Monday - U21 games
Tuesday - NT games / League games
Wedneday - Nothing(?)
Thursday - Scrimmage / Cup games
Friday - Private League games
Saturday - League Games
Sunday - Nothing(?)

So we could have the alliance games run either Wednesday or Sunday. I would prefer wednesday because it makes my working week go faster when I have BB games to look forward to :)

And alliance games would work similar to private league - injuries, minutes, etc have no effect on players (i.e. arcade mode), but players current gameshape counts towards the teams performance.

This Post:
00
142936.19 in reply to 142936.15
Date: 5/6/2010 10:34:54 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
110110
That is true and I agree on this bit. You will only form an alliance with people you trust rather than teaming up with any random to get strength.

Yo! Yo! D for D best PF in D Aussie BB. D Name is Kye Duffill (10080211), averages nothing but pure amazing! Vote for Duffman!
This Post:
00
142936.20 in reply to 142936.16
Date: 5/6/2010 10:46:06 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
110110
good suggestion but maybe not restricted to 1 player nomination per member because basically means that you will need to have 10 members so the alliance can compete with full strength (benchers aswell). maybe 2 nominations per member so that our minimum requirement of an alliance is 4 to 10 members.

Last edited by datzilla at 5/6/2010 10:47:07 PM

Yo! Yo! D for D best PF in D Aussie BB. D Name is Kye Duffill (10080211), averages nothing but pure amazing! Vote for Duffman!
From: JW

This Post:
00
142936.21 in reply to 142936.15
Date: 5/6/2010 11:25:42 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
7070
totally agree with your point Naker. i could understand bikkering & fighting over who makes the team & what not, but ultimately the selected leader of the alliance should get the final say. If a player isnt happy then they would be more than welcome to leave the alliance.

due to teams already playing each other in Private League games means it gives the Alliance Leader an edge that other Alliance members dont have. Because the leader can see the stats of other Private League team star players.

jw

From: JW

This Post:
00
142936.22 in reply to 142936.16
Date: 5/6/2010 11:27:53 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
7070
that is an AWESOME idea!! Either a 1 or 2 player limit would be fair for everyone in the PL All Star Team. It will showcase the skill set available for a particular Private League.

This encourages everyone in a particular private league alliance to train players up well & in line with what everyone else in teh Alliance is doing.

jw

Advertisement