BuzzerBeater Forums

USA - II.4 > 33.33333% All Big II.4 Allstars

33.33333% All Big II.4 Allstars

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
152732.12 in reply to 152732.11
Date: 7/26/2010 6:10:00 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
129129
Very nice info, Rambo. You do a great job of giving us all good "stuff" to read!...The lack of Riverdogs on this team is not surprising to me. My team has been pretty well balanced personnel-wise for a long time, but we are often challenged offensively.. Guess the Riverdogs and the Machines may very well be the Rodney Dangerfields of this league:-)

Last edited by Pappy ODaniel at 7/26/2010 6:12:41 PM

Pappy
This Post:
00
152732.13 in reply to 152732.12
Date: 7/26/2010 6:26:58 PM
New York Jests
IV.30
Overall Posts Rated:
219219
Well with respect to old Darky...he did have 4 players mentioned. Unfortunately, I haven't figured out an easy way to quantify defensive contributions in individual performances. And with you being one of the top defensive teams...you get left out in the cold.

It also tends to be skewed with polarized teams. If someone has one or two players head and shoulders better than the rest they get the lion's share of the stats.

This Post:
00
152732.14 in reply to 152732.13
Date: 7/26/2010 6:32:50 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
129129
You're spot on as usual. And I wasn't really complaining about the selections (as they make great reading!), just actually commenting. Defensive contributions are much harder to take into account. Regardless, I do know for a fact that our league is the toughest II in the USA.

Pappy
This Post:
00
152732.15 in reply to 152732.14
Date: 7/26/2010 6:42:03 PM
New York Jests
IV.30
Overall Posts Rated:
219219
I feel the same way about our league, though maybe not to the degree that I would call it fact. I haven't really gone around researching others.

This Post:
00
152732.16 in reply to 152732.15
Date: 7/26/2010 7:38:20 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
129129
Well, you're probably right—it's not a fact, just a very strong gut feeling!

Pappy
This Post:
00
152732.17 in reply to 152732.16
Date: 7/26/2010 7:42:56 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
134134
As a potential promotee to D2, I would least like to land in II.4 and II.1. It's about equal between the two. After that, II.2. Finally, I'd most like to land in II.3.

=D

From: lathrop

This Post:
00
152732.18 in reply to 152732.13
Date: 7/26/2010 9:28:54 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
8888
It also tends to be skewed with polarized teams. If someone has one or two players head and shoulders better than the rest they get the lion's share of the stats.



Guilty as charged!

This Post:
00
152732.19 in reply to 152732.5
Date: 7/27/2010 7:50:26 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
744744

PF – Raymond Timmons – I’ll Replace You With Machines – Probably, personally most frustrating player. I’d also wager he’s one of the most uniquely mis-trained players in the league.


Fixed that for you.

(http://www.buzzerbeater.com/community/fedoverview.aspx?fe...)
Keep your friend`s toast, and your enemy`s toaster.
This Post:
00
152732.20 in reply to 152732.19
Date: 7/27/2010 7:56:39 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
129129
Sweet! Maybe i should write my own for some of my unpicked All Stars:-). My frustration level has to at least rival yours!

Pappy
This Post:
00
152732.21 in reply to 152732.1
Date: 7/27/2010 5:26:07 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
744744
I think it's worth noting that your math is incorrect in the thread title.

The figure you're looking for is something like 31.818181818%, not 33.33333%. There are 22 games in a season.

(http://www.buzzerbeater.com/community/fedoverview.aspx?fe...)
Keep your friend`s toast, and your enemy`s toaster.
This Post:
00
152732.22 in reply to 152732.21
Date: 7/27/2010 6:17:26 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
4343
Maybe he's going by total days in a season, and not games?

Too lazy to figure it out.

Advertisement