BuzzerBeater Forums

Help - English > 2-3

2-3

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
186170.12 in reply to 186170.7
Date: 6/3/2011 7:22:12 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
5151
For this two game week I'm training JS for forwards, so two of my trainees will be playing 48 mins at SF and PF in the league game. They both have 11 OD and 9 ID. I've never played 2-3 zone but I'm willing to test it out with this formation.

My opponent has played LI for most of their recent games. Will a 2-3 zone be effective?

This Post:
00
186170.16 in reply to 186170.15
Date: 6/10/2011 8:19:15 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
2424
I don't really get where he says Base Offense is the strongest offense. It's clear in the GE that the best offense is solely dependent on your personnel. And not by being flawed either.

From: Johnson

This Post:
00
186170.17 in reply to 186170.14
Date: 6/11/2011 1:45:10 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
5151
Too bad I lost the game :(
I don't think I will play with 2-3 again anytime soon

From: Bigcatjc

This Post:
00
186170.20 in reply to 186170.18
Date: 6/11/2011 4:29:33 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
2424
It really doesn't make any sense. I guess if you have the perfectly designed and balanced team according to the GE that the Base Offense is the way to go, but everyone has a different offensive scheme.

Some teams may be balanced, but want to rely on an outstanding point guard and run Push the Ball. Others might have a balanced attack, but an outstanding perimeter shooter and run Patient.

Etc, etc.

This Post:
00
186170.21 in reply to 186170.20
Date: 6/11/2011 5:33:12 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
i believe the thing it is saying, that if you play something different then base offense you get bonus and malus on certain skills, but the "amount" of maluses is bigger then the bonuses.

Btw i would uses inside or outside tactics as examples ;)

Last edited by CrazyEye at 6/11/2011 5:33:35 PM

Advertisement