BuzzerBeater Forums

Help - English > Research

Research (thread closed)

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
219860.13 in reply to 219860.12
Date: 6/15/2012 10:08:34 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
4242
I used the law of conservation of salary. Let's say the unbalanced team has two post players salary 100k and two guards salary 20k. SF salary 10k. Then the balanced team will have big men and guards and SF ALL salary 50k.
That's what I meant, not four monsters with 80k salary! :P

By balance I meant salary wise balanced and intro skillset balance(center having good JS,HAN, and PAS). Otherwise they'd just be mono-skilled, wouldn't they?? :/

I took the backup factor to be null. Only starters, all have strong GS, and all have average stamina.

This Post:
00
219860.14 in reply to 219860.13
Date: 6/15/2012 10:11:14 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
4242
I also stated that the beasts on the unbalanced team have to be mono-skilled because players with salaries greater than 80k AND good secondaries go for a LOT. (as much as 3 million in my experience). This kind of expenditure is not practical for our average team.

This Post:
00
219860.15 in reply to 219860.12
Date: 6/15/2012 10:15:51 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
4242
It will be balanced vs balanced. To be unbalanced salaries HAVE to be different.

Sorry I meant salary distribution has to be different. The unbalanced team has to have a couple of beasts and 'not so beastly' guards and SF, whereas the balanced team will have balance all across the board.

This Post:
00
219860.16 in reply to 219860.11
Date: 6/15/2012 6:12:02 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
1212
On one of the first posts you say that you want to research if it's worth having a balanced team considering that an unbalanced one has specialist. But seems your focus is tactical, then your conclusion is that a balanced team is better in the long term. Sorry, I don't get it. I still believe that a short term analysis should be made with similar salaries and a strategic research should more elaborated finances.

This Post:
00
219860.17 in reply to 219860.16
Date: 6/15/2012 11:31:08 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
4242
I'm sorry if you don't get it, but I don't see how I could be any clearer. If the salaries are similiar, either the balanced team becomes unbalanced or the unbalanced team becomes balanced. Bottom line: Both teams are similar. No need for research. I've already stated that the salary distribution is different but the sum of salaries of both teams is the same. And ofc the unbalanced team will have a tactical speciality. Only a fool would play a neutral offense with a specialist.
Second, I believe someone said, "BB is a marathon, not a sprint." So there is no reason to see only short term gains. Even then, if you read carefully, in the conclusions, I HAVE stated that both teams have their advantages and I've given advantages for BOTH teams. Balanced edges out unbalanced and is long-term, unbalanced is short term and has an element of surprise. LOL. Seriously, this is the clearest it can get :P

Last edited by Dr. Iron Man at 6/15/2012 11:34:35 PM

This Post:
11
219860.18 in reply to 219860.17
Date: 6/16/2012 1:32:17 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
1212
Never meant to disrespect your research, but I don't see many people agreeing with you. Maybe your research was irrelevant.

Have a nice day.

This Post:
00
219860.19 in reply to 219860.18
Date: 6/16/2012 11:53:55 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
4242
LOL!! Funniest thing is that you are the only person who doesn't agree with me!! Terfu agreed with me(he had an objection but it turned out to be a misunderstanding(miscommunication on my part)) and I even think he gave me a ball. Maybe not but he didn't have any objection after that. You are the only person who dislikes my research and at least four people like it.

This Post:
00
219860.20 in reply to 219860.19
Date: 6/17/2012 10:15:20 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
1212
I'm sorry. I hadn't realized you received so many balls. Have a nice day.

This Post:
00
219860.21 in reply to 219860.20
Date: 6/17/2012 10:52:19 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
4242
LOL :P

This Post:
11
219860.22 in reply to 219860.19
Date: 6/17/2012 7:34:27 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
126126
LOL!! Funniest thing is that you are the only person who doesn't agree with me!! Terfu agreed with me(he had an objection but it turned out to be a misunderstanding(miscommunication on my part)) and I even think he gave me a ball. Maybe not but he didn't have any objection after that. You are the only person who dislikes my research and at least four people like it.


4 people....
50,000 people on BB. Not all active on forums, but clearly more than 4 ppl...

I wouldn't say he's the only person that disliked your research, just maybe the only one who bothered to voice it.

Advertisement