BuzzerBeater Forums

Suggestions > Firing player restrictions

Firing player restrictions

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
254340.12 in reply to 254340.5
Date: 1/22/2014 6:49:08 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
689689
the fact those junk players are worth nothing is of NT FARM TEAMS, who grew them. DO you expect to take care of ur farmed trash? You farmed, you take care, dont whine. Thats my point of view.

Wolph! You finally made it out of Japan?!


Anyway, I don't think anything should be changed. Most of the time, when you fire a player, you're either on the brink of brankrupty, or you're just firing your newly acquired useless rookies. In those cases, paying one week of salary would be unfair in my mind.

Le forum francophone dédié à Buzzerbeater : (http://buzzerbeaterfrance.forumpro.fr/) Vous y trouverez conseils et partage
This Post:
33
254340.13 in reply to 254340.12
Date: 1/22/2014 7:03:08 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
310310
Actually the problem is when you buying a 250k salary player for 10k, play him on 2-3 games then fire him just before salary.

Rookie salary is not a big amount. When you go bankrupt, you don't buy 250k salary guys.
Anyway, the rule could be this: you can't fire a player who played a game on your team, before giving him a week of salary.
This way, rookie salary doesn't count as they didn't play a single minute for you. When you sell a player who was part of team for weeks, months, years, the rule doesn't affect you, because you already paid a week of salary earlier. The only case that this rule counts is the case mentioned in the top row.

Don't feed the troll
This Post:
00
254340.15 in reply to 254340.14
Date: 1/25/2014 11:34:08 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
310310
Well, that's a way but an NT coach won't call in 10-12 NT caliber players with 7 and lower shape. Also it makes teams go bankrupt.

And the real problem is not that (they are "ready" to be retired) but that someone gets an unfair advantage on buying them and then firing before Sunday evening and avoid paying salary. Lots of cases the buyer spends 10-20k on a player with 250k+ salary and play him on 2 games. That means he gets a 2-game boost that woth 250k+ and pays only 20k.

Don't feed the troll
This Post:
00
254340.16 in reply to 254340.15
Date: 1/25/2014 11:43:40 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
32293229
Well, that's a way but an NT coach won't call in 10-12 NT caliber players with 7 and lower shape. Also it makes teams go bankrupt.

And the real problem is not that (they are "ready" to be retired) but that someone gets an unfair advantage on buying them and then firing before Sunday evening and avoid paying salary. Lots of cases the buyer spends 10-20k on a player with 250k+ salary and play him on 2 games. That means he gets a 2-game boost that woth 250k+ and pays only 20k.


The simple solution would be that purchasing a player means that you have to keep him on your roster (no sale / no firing) for seven weeks.

This Post:
00
254340.17 in reply to 254340.16
Date: 1/26/2014 2:14:22 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
310310
Seven weeks is maybe too much. It would be enough to just pay one week before firing to avoid system exploiting

Don't feed the troll
This Post:
00
254340.18 in reply to 254340.10
Date: 1/27/2014 10:28:48 AM
Zero Gravity
II.3
Overall Posts Rated:
185185
Second Team:
Ground Zero
Mate,

Even if we all, or at least 90% of the players are agree on that farming is not good the way how this guys is doing (and there are many others already) and actually makes advantages is not fair. Not fair with the others. Probably this is not against the current rules as it looks there are no rules to cover this at this point of time (as Charlie mentioned he found a backdoor ) but it is still not the way how this should be.

I think that is obvious you can`t hire someone to work with you then fire him/her without paying salary.
The only difference is that we do not have a proper rule for this in BB, but it does not change the fact this is not correct.

You can not pursue and punish all bad guy just because the police could not get them, even if the people may feel sympathy with you. He is not doing a good job, neither for the community nor him/herself.
Using common sense we can not say that this is OK just because we do not have a rule or policy for this.
If we would have a policy in place this will be unacceptable? Come on....




This Post:
00
254340.19 in reply to 254340.18
Date: 1/27/2014 10:31:18 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
219219
I agree the problem exsists, but i think that the economy is ruined and we need to fix economy, not to add more stupid restrictions. we need to increase conomy so high salaried player would be worth way more than their salaries and they would be unafordable for buying 3 200+k guys before playoffs and wining a league. so this would solve the need of luxury tax, which should be unneeded and other problems aswell.

Last edited by Gajus Julijus Cezaris at 1/27/2014 10:32:54 AM

This Post:
00
254340.20 in reply to 254340.19
Date: 1/27/2014 1:25:13 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
2323
If he is going to be fired before sunday- the economy update- he's salary won't affect the luxury tax.
So if i buy 10 mosters for 10.000 every week Monday, and i fire them on Sunday i won't pay for them anithing (and they can play 3 games on this week...).

This Post:
00
254340.21 in reply to 254340.20
Date: 1/27/2014 2:20:51 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
219219
but if their transfer price would be atleat 500k you wouldnt be able to do it eficiently nobody would spend 1m for 2guys then fire them in 3 games thats 333k per game, kind of expensive.

Last edited by Gajus Julijus Cezaris at 1/27/2014 2:21:26 PM

This Post:
00
254340.22 in reply to 254340.21
Date: 1/27/2014 2:36:37 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
310310
And if you should pay a week of salary before firing them, it would be the same case, nobody could do it efficiently.
That's the original suggestion

Don't feed the troll
Advertisement