BuzzerBeater Forums

In addition:
* Trainer, atleast level Advanced right now. (Same goes for PR and Doctor imo, get these two right before next season) Not too expensive, check out a few deadlines to get a clue on what the prices are for a Staff with a certain salary. Try to get as low salarys as possible since the increase wit hevery week.
* Train Anson, Jiang and Shönhammer, the three with reasonable age and potential (seek to replace them in the beginning of next season) 1 position, maybe OD(pressure) and PA(passing) for PG:s. Play Shönhammer in scrimmage =)
* BUILD ARENA! More important them adding players to roster.
Get the infrastructure(Arena, Staff, Training, Economics) of the club ready for the next step before you actually take it!
I see no real danger of relegation, nor any chance of promoting in this or the next season, so no need to rush things. Build patiently

If read what i said. i say more clearly. I said if you want a very dynamic sf meaning very very good one(rare). Its very hard and expensive. A very dynamic point cguard is way more expensive than a dynamic Sf. We can dis agree on that becuase we have our own principles and likes.

A dynamic Pg going up, will win you more games than a dynamic sf in his starts, You can say you have to do off training, rightfully so. Now if your smart, you would use scrimmages and Private league matches just for that not actual league games( off traning). The whole point is to get as much training as possible.To train toward these 2 players types. A big man is dime a dozen. It not hard to find big man. Find me a dynamic point guard or sf.. Its like pulling hen teeth. Only way he is goign to get it is to train it. Which is think the best way, go for both.

I also disgree with your assetment that you find cant be big man for under 1 million. That is highly false.I have seen team go all the way to top with lesser big men players. A dynamic pg will always cost alot of money, a sf wont unless he dynamically skilled. They key is word here is highly skilled. Agian im not just talking about just training a player . Im talking about 15-20's in every slot here. Then tactic play a huge part in his actual worth for the team. The winning. Every great team on this game had a great dynamic pg, not many had a dynamic sf. That not saying to easier to get or harder . Its saying it better to get becuase of tactic worth. As i said before it would better for him to get both.

A dynamic pg will win you more games , harder to stop, than the dynamic sf all they have to do is put a Center/ or dynamic sg on him. With a pg they cannt do that. you know why.A dynamic pg is a floor general . The higher skill the more dominate he becomes which means passing, reb. steals. the whole 9, the greater the tactic to his skills, the more lethal. As far as my personal understanding goes. I have seen more dynamic Sf stopped than pg in big games.

As far as (is) and all economic saving for NT thats a wonderful thing. My whole point is to win games early. 3pts is worth more than 2pts. Assist are worth their salts in close games. Those are the things manager will have to master early to be successful. If a team want to start with dynamic sf that a long, long road, they will need to understand 1 player cant do it alone( which mean lose for awhile as they build him). A dynamic pg can do it alone, you know why? Thats his job. (As a dynamic pg gets better so does the team, yes it highly costly but its worth it inthe lonmg haul). I cant speak for every team on here, but thats how i see when i look around.

Thats how i see it. The more great player he can bring up the better. He shouldn't just go for 1 great player. Balanced teams win more than one way team. My ending point



Last edited by Mr. Glass at 2/11/2014 1:42:08 PM

Thats not my general point. As a experienced manager you should read the rest of sentences. The whole point is to get as much trianing as possible. That does not mean direct training, it means to make the player adjust to the train'n he will be getting long term. Its called placing him in tactic to be effective something you should know.

But i doubt you'll read that far to understang my gerneral points.I know you'll look for holes to say this or that which i think is very petty.

My ending point was my whole point in a nut shell. Maybe you cant start right there. He should build both*.As far as the rest of post he can void it becuase it wasnt directed to the op but my replyr. Its my personal assesment to him not the op.

But to the Op he should get and train both aswell as build arena.

you are kidding me right?
all round build sf will win you games and putting sg and for sure c wont help for sure.
now 90% of us play LI as our main offense but as u know even in LI there are a lot of jumpers.
if u put big man your sf will rape that C apart.
let me give u couple of examples.its croatian 3rd league and standard should be around USA 4th(dont have enough time to check rosters around usa leagues atm) and it should be familiar to u.

SF vs SF
(66063519)

my opponents SF 50k salary(JS monster)
mine 20k salary(all rounder)
rating:
12,5 - 13,5

(66063535)
28k vs 20k
9,0 - 13,5

(66063550)
28k vs 20k
10,5 vs 11,5

SF vs PG
(66063578)
31k vs 20k
9,0 vs 12,0
especially check this game ;)

if u want ill play him next game on PF so ull see how it plays out against trees :)

Thats not my general point. As a experienced manager you should read the rest of sentences. The whole point is to get as much trianing as possible. That does not mean direct training, it means to make the player adjust to the train'n he will be getting long term. Its called placing him in tactic to be effective something you should know.

But i doubt you'll read that far to understang my gerneral points.I know you'll look for holes to say this or that which i think is very petty.

My ending point was my whole point in a nut shell. Maybe you cant start right there. He should build both*.As far as the rest of post he can void it becuase it wasnt directed to the op but my replyr. Its my personal assesment to him not the op.

But to the Op he should get and train both aswell as build arena.

This has to be a troll. Nobody thinks "the player" needs to know anything about anything. Our players don't have emotions/egos

My whole point is to win games early. 3pts is worth more than 2pts. Assist are worth their salts in close games. Those are the things manager will have to master early to be successful.
[...]
Thats how i see it. The more great player he can bring up the better. He shouldn't just go for 1 great player. Balanced teams win more than one way team. My ending point

I utterly disagree with most of what you write in general and in your post, but I will give you credit for typing the words above as they are actually somehow wise.

The things I personally put a lot of stock in when evaluating a team and their performance:
1. How much salary do they pay their 6th-10th (or even deeper) players? The better their backups and reserves, the more likely they are to weather injuries and to gain ground late in quarters against tired starters or overmatched scrubs.
2. Can they at least put up a credible inside offense, inside defense, outside offense and outside defense? Some teams can put up very nice ratings in inside offenses only, but they don't have the ability to mix in a changeup tactic - which means they'd better be darned good at their primary tactic to overcome the GDP.
3. Turnovers, turnovers, turnovers! Assists might go here too, because that's a very important part too, but if you show me a team that's among the best in the league both in avoiding turnovers and in forcing their opponent to turn it over, and they're putting up a decent defense, you've got a perennial contender.

A all around sf take time to build his skill wont be able to play the harder tactic till later when he is more developed.A pg skill are always going ready to play tactic regardless of good or bad. It just how the game works.Unless his ksill are greater than everyone else at time.

I have to disagree not saying your wrong but on principles of timing of the player. I have game seen games where the big man pretty dominate the dynamic sf. With big men having outside defense as well as inside as of late. Nothing that sf could do beyond pass. Alot pf ./C have outside defense now mores dynamic than every before with shot blocking increase, a dynamic Sf has be up onhis A game every game, with none having great skills to compliment him it pretty much a waste of team and time, one man cant do it all. When they are1st starting off his skill wont be so great( the op is 5 league).So what your saying is later in his career,

A pg that is not the case. Most tactic are built toward the pg in mind, only1-2 for Sf. Same as li/Lp is built for big man in mind. What this leads to is limted skill to be successful earlyas you build him. Im not talking about creating mix- matches. Im talking pure skills for the tactic. This why is i say *I would take pg 1st*. but the op should take both and train them to highest level to achieve this goals.

Not to disgree with what you have shown or anything. On personal prefences i would take the Pg 1st, I honestly feel A pg will win you more games than a sf.

Jump Shot: marvelous Jump Range: prominent
Outside Def.: tremendous Handling: sensational
Driving: marvelous Passing: wondrous
Inside Shot: strong Inside Def.: wondrous
Rebounding: average Shot Blocking: average
Stamina: strong Free Throw: marvelous

Experience: strong

i would say allstar or higher. This is just a plan example of bsic dynamic PG. I would this highly possible for any manager to do.Anything higher would be harder and very expensive. This guard could play 5 tactic to about 15ppg and 8 asst game.

Players = managers such as yourself and myself. If we dont need to know anything then I guess it would be in our best intrest to ask to close the help guide.