BuzzerBeater Forums

Suggestions > Exclude bot teams from Draft

Exclude bot teams from Draft

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
11
324644.14 in reply to 324644.11
Date: 8/19/2024 12:42:27 PM
Súria Lakers
IV.25
Overall Posts Rated:
34283428
Second Team:
Súria Lakers II
Yeah, and what's the problem? Giving managers the possibility to train decent players will always be a good thing. It can be frustrating to always invets on Draft and not getting anything, season after season, year after year...

Anyway, half of them will be poorly trained, so it doesn't matter. I can't see any bad side of it even you try to justify one.

PKT desde la Temporada 4



Para ver la imagen en mayor tamaño:
(https://i.postimg.cc/mDhxMLDX/e3700169252f336ab3c187ad4773...)
From: testudo
This Post:
1111
324644.18 in reply to 324644.17
Date: 8/19/2024 2:06:36 PM
Isca Centurions
EBBL
Overall Posts Rated:
402402
Second Team:
Dartmoor Pumas
Only skim-read the topic, but I agree with Perpete.

* If more players hit the market, the value of players goes down. It is already cheap and easy to buy trainees thanks to the boosts to the draft (especially the large increase in skills of 19 year olds). When I started the advice was to buy trainees with 7 potential, these days everyone can afford 8-9 potential. The only reason to buy less is for training U21 players or maybe a very niche build that doesn't benefit from it.

* Yes, it is frustrating when a 10 potential player is drafted by a bot and is lost to the NT. But if all these players were released then it would reduce the value of everyone who drafted those type of players. In the past (and probably going forward), the club teams come ahead of the national teams.

* These days you are guaranteed at least one 5/5 player in the draft, and in most drafts I've seen (small sample) there are several. Plus a handful of others who are worth something. So yes, you are very likely to draft at least one good player with a high draft pick. Even if your league is full of bots, you are still likely to draft well. Bots pick randomly so you have an excellent chance of getting some of the players at the top of your list.

This Post:
00
324644.19 in reply to 324644.18
Date: 8/19/2024 3:34:31 PM
Súria Lakers
IV.25
Overall Posts Rated:
34283428
Second Team:
Súria Lakers II
BB changes over the last years are always focused on the training (more facilities, extended years without skilldrops, luxury training tax, etc) and you say that flood the transfer list with young players is a bad thing? WOW

Excuse me to disagree, but there is no problem with that. There will be more players, yes. Value of those players will go down, yes (and? Everyteam will have more opportunities, bringing them to more equality and cutting down prices with develope players, so more team will have chances to create good teams = more competition).

I guess only the rich managers are against this suggestion, because this will bring more competitors to them in a few years. Anyone else who really likes the training part of this game (the fun part of the game tbf) will also have more opportunities.

I keep saying this could be a win-win situation.

PKT desde la Temporada 4



Para ver la imagen en mayor tamaño:
(https://i.postimg.cc/mDhxMLDX/e3700169252f336ab3c187ad4773...)
Advertisement