BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > IBBF - Unofficial-Not-Elite Sanctioning Committee Organisation

IBBF - Unofficial-Not-Elite Sanctioning Committee Organisation

Set priority
Show messages by
Message deleted
This Post:
00
36864.13 in reply to 36864.12
Date: 6/24/2008 4:34:00 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
44
they would probably need to be tweaked right now.

under the suggested weight classes it would sort out like this:
Heavyweight: 9 countries
Light-Heavyweight: 7 countries
Middleweight: 7 countries
Welterweight: 19 countries
Lightweight: 42 countries

as you can see it would be a little bottom heavy. plus some very high ranked national teams would be in some very low weight classes. though that can probably be fixed by allowing teams to play up for belts, which is what happens in real life.

Message deleted
Message deleted
Message deleted
Message deleted
This Post:
00
36864.19 in reply to 36864.13
Date: 6/24/2008 5:44:12 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
387387
BTW, much respect for working that out. Perhaps we could have a featherweight category as well.

Message deleted
Message deleted
This Post:
00
36864.22 in reply to 36864.18
Date: 6/24/2008 5:47:39 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
44
if this is done with the suggested weight classes we can do it a number of ways:

based solely on user numbers these would be the initial title holders and the rest is up for grabs:
Heavyweight: España
Light-Heavyweight: Polska
Middleweight: Hellas
Welterweight: România
Lightweight: Österreich

or it can be done by separating by active users and then using the current NT rankings:
Heavyweight: Italia
Light-Heavyweight: China
Middleweight: Brasil
Welterweight: Canada
Lightweight: Nigeria

obviously this can be done a number of ways. all i know is that the current unofficial heavyweight belt is not as inclusive as it can be, which is what it's original intention was.

Advertisement