BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > New season news?????

New season news?????

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
191779.125 in reply to 191779.122
Date: 7/27/2011 6:25:33 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
404404
And,maybe as the most important thing,slows the training of the players in the main skills,giving a big advantage in short-mid term to the teams that actually have better players,because who wants to create a player with the same primary skills will need more time to reach them

And where is the difference between now and then? So if I got 8 pops from full season OD training before, now I will get 7. It's the same for all players, so there willl still be the same gap between better and worse players who receive the same training.

Few players receive training when they are 25-26-27years or older because of a lot of reasons(too high salaries for the league,potential cap,change of training of the owner,etc...),so the change for them is minimal
But all the young players that are trained will suffer from this reduction in the training of the primary skills.1 pop for season for 7-8 seasons means 7-8 primary skills less for a player that have to be trained for a lot of weeks when he'll be26-27 years to reach the level of the actual player who is not trained to reach the same skills
I would call this a BIG advantage...

This Post:
00
191779.126 in reply to 191779.124
Date: 7/27/2011 6:26:44 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
404404
So, I have taken my 200k guard and compared the difference between his salary with rb at 7 and rb at 8.

The difference is 13k. The guard dropped 15k in salary this offseason alone.

So
(i) overall, salaries are going and will continue to go down
(ii) insofar as something modestly counterbalances the effect of salary reductions, it applies equally to all managers.

It would however be 13k more than what it should be with reduced salary.It's not really a point this

This Post:
00
191779.127 in reply to 191779.122
Date: 7/27/2011 6:29:27 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
209209
Yes, but I think his point was that it was unfair on managers who have the already capped players because it will now take longer to train them for yourself if you don't have any. However that's only true in primary skills, those players lack in secondaries that they will also need to compete with the future capped players with better secondaries.
But if my SG has 17 OD and 6 IS, I think he's better than your SG with 18 JR and 5 ID. Just my opinion.

"Air is beautiful, yet you cannot see it. It's soft, yet you cannot touch it. Air is a little like my brain." - Jean-Claude Van Damme
This Post:
00
191779.129 in reply to 191779.127
Date: 7/27/2011 6:35:42 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
404404
Yes, but I think his point was that it was unfair on managers who have the already capped players because it will now take longer to train them for yourself if you don't have any. However that's only true in primary skills, those players lack in secondaries that they will also need to compete with the future capped players with better secondaries.

Ask to whatever succesful Nt coach if 7-8 points in primary skills make the difference among the players that are convened and the players who aren't...
And we will not lose primary skills to train only the secondary skills that can actually help him on the floor,but there will be trained both useful and useless skill,so however there's a loss for the newly trained players against the "old" and yet trained players

This Post:
11
191779.130 in reply to 191779.126
Date: 7/27/2011 6:36:01 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
2323
This stupid cross-training is utterly ridiculous. I'm really getting sick of the BBs constantly telling us how to play the game. I've been on this game since season 6 and it seemed each major update consisted nothing of the BBs shoving a new game style down our throats.

Just because BB-Charles likes balanced players, EVERYONE has to have balanced players. When the elastic effect was fully known, fine, everyone stopped the mono-skilled players and used it to an advantage to create well rounded players in guard skills, or well rounded players in big man skills...but NO! That's not good enough. Everyone has to be completely well rounded.


In season 20 our news is going to be that we can't train any skill 2 points higher than another, so everyone is just going to be proficient in everything.

This Post:
00
191779.131 in reply to 191779.128
Date: 7/27/2011 6:39:08 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
404404
Because,also few k for week make the difference for the strategies of a team,so everything that increase the salaries and it's not choosen by the users make the difference

This Post:
00
191779.132 in reply to 191779.127
Date: 7/27/2011 6:43:35 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
2323
Yes, but I think his point was that it was unfair on managers who have the already capped players because it will now take longer to train them for yourself if you don't have any. However that's only true in primary skills, those players lack in secondaries that they will also need to compete with the future capped players with better secondaries.
But if my SG has 17 OD and 6 IS, I think he's better than your SG with 18 JR and 5 ID. Just my opinion.




How would that make him better? IS is almost entirely useless for shooting guards in most offenses. I mean, maybe if you run PTB....ID is at least somewhat useful.


And to suggest that players that have better secondaries are going to be better than players with better primaries is ridiculous. Especially when it's a TEN PERCENT decrease. TEN...that's not a little amount

Say you have a training speed of .4 that's three weeks + some sublevel in the old seasons. Now it's going to .36 which is 4 weeks. Awesome.


And yeah.....a dude with 18 JS 17 OD and good primaries is going to beat a guy with 16JS 15OD but 8 shotblocking! The shotblocking is the great equalizer people! OR 8 IS...which is also (not) awesome for shooting guards.

Last edited by Amarestars at 7/27/2011 6:47:53 PM

This Post:
00
191779.134 in reply to 191779.131
Date: 7/27/2011 6:57:12 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
699699
It's the same for everyone.

It's like you saying it's unfair the race is now 101m when it used to be 100m. It's not unfair, everyone will have to run those 101m.

Advertisement